From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9425A1F461 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43224 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkWI2-0003A3-4g for normalperson@yhbt.net; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 12:14:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkWHy-00039i-6x for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 12:14:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkWHx-0004pp-9G for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 12:14:50 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:53134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkWHx-0004ee-2w for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 12:14:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389891626AE; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id KfNoO3346siF; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF9B1626AF; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:14:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id hxuKT4fxwtSw; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E02D161D54; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Visibility of gnulib's symbols To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc_Nieper-Wi=c3=9fkirchen?= References: From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:14:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Marc Nieper-Wi=C3=9Fkirchen wrote: > What is the canonical way to solve this? Is there an easy way to add > $(CFLAGS_VISIBLITY) to the CFLAGs when gnulib is compiled? Or should I = try > something different? It's hard to say without seeing what you've got. You misspelled CFLAG_VIS= IBILITY=20 in your email, which suggests that the problem could be a simple misspell= ing.