From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945A41F9FD for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59918 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJBwe-0003Ej-BO for normalperson@yhbt.net; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:12:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJBwW-0003EZ-KH for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:12:48 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]:36401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJBwU-0004L5-Ni for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:12:48 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id o22so520174oic.3 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 01:12:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sc3d.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dg65M1V124faibwPM9YBGdULAKM1Kedt1Gvvgu2anfc=; b=PApl5FH9orYH54I8qUJbT3iyED/6WV4m2+9eIRaAhw4RXkSM+J5gflKM9X9UtQA8M4 uqaIF+CEaBtOVtwBkM6TIMbtqvXQf2olKkf+ZGc07oiZkhqdqXFFt+yVlGeDzwIEvBdE 51r7ESPdkRMy26YrirJsoTbgRwGl8FKTJV4Lo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dg65M1V124faibwPM9YBGdULAKM1Kedt1Gvvgu2anfc=; b=cdvjTYX7xNWh8wQJg5JQKKZdIv0WJI3TeDuP+98bbJzRSCatboDz+75tl0PB9a/ZR+ nMRvkkfvb15z35f0BJjUyxefTnOjjwPnYbelovSxQoagUnejjVQwmLbdeTwf7LsL8dlZ eSp0CzPJUlJJ6LkpvLKLTBKcMqM/7GoQRX0yIaYLBzXheQ4PR0nQbkviMMOd63WSFW/i 72Pc1BmUGaj7ZUH/s0J34RPSsH59Udna2NAAdM8nr5vQxBjDKg4sf/PLP1rCQa+cFYi4 LOMoz+paWNvPM+HrOH5dKEeK93f4hWZGUCnYSHoOnRhSAyLAEfz2WEF35d3EcHnyBsd6 S2IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53103woUylZ4D7BKOexhOMw5tGellu4b0DYUrYzTUwD+AiYBjQWQ VCLS8mEJeaVxTLDYsjl+fYMoulGD+1e1GxwrRwmUelgzjz46nQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxs1WpCCoCikYE8pD0EkDKeyYqo0Mr5bor+DuNRkz30K8PMbUdRjxex0P4PJ+9C/Pe4+TdsPpFnwdtRxwws9y8= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d68e:: with SMTP id n136mr16999174oig.179.1615194764972; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 01:12:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1841389.BC9EOF7Wat@omega> In-Reply-To: <1841389.BC9EOF7Wat@omega> From: Reuben Thomas Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:12:34 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NAME_MAX on MingW To: Bruno Haible Cc: bug-gnulib Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000035a82f05bd02d649" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::231; envelope-from=rrt@sc3d.org; helo=mail-oi1-x231.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" --00000000000035a82f05bd02d649 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 00:14, Bruno Haible wrote: > > I don't see anything Gnulib should do here. > Having looked into this, it seems that the same issues apply to PATH_MAX, yet gnulib has a pathmax module to define PATH_MAX. What's different in that case? -- https://rrt.sc3d.org --00000000000035a82f05bd02d649 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 00:14, Bruno Haible= <bruno@clisp.org> wrote:
<= /div>

I don't see anything Gnulib should do here.

Having looked into this, it seems that the = same issues apply to PATH_MAX, yet gnulib has a pathmax module to define PA= TH_MAX. What's different in that case?

--
--00000000000035a82f05bd02d649--