From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D924C1F4B4 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59944 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQlw-0002pl-Kj for normalperson@yhbt.net; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:23:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQld-0002gZ-Mg for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:23:31 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::132]:37088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQlW-0006J2-8I for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:23:28 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id o17so64693477lfg.4 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:23:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=burtonini-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uw52zFFt6r4/HFD+Wbn2tB6TBltIz1p8vzhPcFqWqlo=; b=f/5v9mB63xmGrMNGBa8qAL3/uUgM14f7sPWAXGAPSy5FiaUimdVeob4ZKHa8BNxfFV R2+tzdxLhBw/J0ZRu5v0h42lh27LeDNCcbUDuB06OXY9SCy9pNPKjO7Z11ms2wTBeV6i +tk9vRRTVQhTha6GPAWLQ8edUDs9MWWI7uV++sW3NI0Ss4z9gphnk9I6Qrf/88smt3iv fWtW02P+329AADgvSWEstJ4VqR85bGkA3A2JVyYmw26SNcsbtjxrVmXvRfIgvHTnh3ds 5lP2nUIwLaCykI8dKa/xr+qh2cGEBXmZTmEBtvBApCmsvnmlThiSwg/IvGz8b0ww9vdd Qiow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uw52zFFt6r4/HFD+Wbn2tB6TBltIz1p8vzhPcFqWqlo=; b=ek3LK88pVxY807kiTM5xR2POw1OiwDGEPOOsRAlGPWckfzUqEfsehmQLue+C3WzgRx BDey3npC6LD4H3Jg6vP7DoHryoefTT83Tft2M6a/zpWanR4glr4YpKm71NFTdgzb5Js1 OW0ccV61Q3IXypT1Rb4brdgGvEomiEM9+1qaj4u3VCxcDbptTiGKToH+hfb565OyZPix 89fnDHjX9BPWa3JBvWeoTN/kxVHPFWmVNyyP/y44shkqrEfyMxJlUtleJmHD2z5ZXJwK GPpBrlUtQrN4xDEm/g72VQOdXrbATaUgqKa0sFVddf+XXczAkn7wL0kujbJchbUW8alA oFgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532L0x/GGhf+KCDjaqj90h8Erx2VvlJOTyHOPBgnDZyKagUSayPV ePKv/PEbFH3NU/yUaJuQmEb2zyz6lBZHuj0RlcBPYQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+Iq9OvMyhz18g4S4ZBijfRGrZ8OYYjHF+Acq5E47febRtWeKBdtLCFvkEKEaEmSt6qL5KeL41qszRHVtH57M= X-Received: by 2002:a19:84f:: with SMTP id 76mr33789152lfi.215.1609770199639; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:23:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2341614.bDMEWdF0VO@omega> In-Reply-To: From: Ross Burton Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:23:08 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request to revert the C version change To: Zack Weinberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::132; envelope-from=ross@burtonini.com; helo=mail-lf1-x132.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Gnulib bugs , Autoconf , Bruno Haible Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" I wanted to test this beforehand but Christmas got in the way. I'm testing the contents of the 2.70 branch now and it's looking good, so thanks very much! Ross On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 19:21, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 12:09 PM Zack Weinberg wrote: > > I'm not happy about needing to kludge backward compatibility with the > > older std-gnu11.m4 into autoconf 2.70.1 but I'm going to do it. > > As of commit 2d0f19d84ddb13412382674fd48e6fc5c2875d0e, Autoconf > *trunk* should now be backward compatible with the older std-gnu11.m4. > I verified that I can regenerate bison 3.7.4's configure script with > that version of Autoconf, making no other changes to the bison release > tarball, and then configure, build, and test bison with no errors. > > The patch is somewhat invasive, though. The full text is attached, > and before I merge it to the 2.70 branch, I'd appreciate any extra > testing and/or code review anyone cares to give it. > > zw