From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEA31F4B4 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 06:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52916 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzEk-000277-Nd for normalperson@yhbt.net; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:42:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzEd-00026r-Lj; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:42:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:35105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzEb-00069v-TB; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:42:07 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id y15so6638067wmi.0; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:42:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CdlIqtgB2bfaaBR0toi0KBtEsdgzJrK53pGpBNeZN+4=; b=EErnoTiHRE3tmvQplXHLyQ9JQ4WpN7TA0CanzsOJlU9BXeFeYRHtrEMTtUhwY4xI9e vaiUlzdNk35UA3RDIYEZy4rRwjkhPDS/0o8XaHWuFiVHxKGm/CQXkxLQRHgp8vrD+DkB mg3usWNGdaJtWa596/+tgRAdvkDAYWc8Ae+UeU5zbLcyBkUR3NIQp0/c+e6THy2Nx2Vt Mnk9A4WveRjl4ipLheEXKMI+b5E8uMA5y1SCb9YLL0k71T6vlhpBqimB5f9Cbvx72qCG soWnwFM3GMEl9l3Xr21Ff8/gOfwhyEXaTI4ruv1E/prKPceWDj5aDQ9b/h8xn4/sAPkV iWkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53105f9rbgGTlu2ciuON1m4+M9qf75J4q4VMYMdFSUDK0ftZz4xl TJadYa7TicJebFJ9jVhaTQsbOvCvJeW9Vw2yUO4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0W03i4mrwGhzx+cE0Tz/G4mQsa8CUKu3DCKbtlzhBApRFcy67k9WEdQRulQg5qQzuU8rWzPhxZ/7aqz7Ff64= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c847:: with SMTP id c7mr5697285wml.149.1599892924162; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:42:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200418002153.8771.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> <20200419074109.431A.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> <20200419111025.4326.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> <0417af9a-50a5-3462-6b38-393d80395085@cs.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: <0417af9a-50a5-3462-6b38-393d80395085@cs.ucla.edu> From: Jim Meyering Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:41:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#40634: Massive pattern list handling with -E format seems very slow since 2.28. To: Paul Eggert Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.128.54; envelope-from=meyering@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-f54.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/12 02:42:04 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: fryasu@yahoo.co.jp, Gnulib bugs , 40634@debbugs.gnu.org, Norihiro Tanaka , GNU grep developers Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 1:01 AM Paul Eggert wrote: > > And here is the adjusted patch: > > Hold on, that looks like a cleanup of the April 18 patch posted here: > > https://bugs.gnu.org/40634#26 > > But there's a later patch dated April 19, which Norihiro Tanaka said should be > more correct and simpler: > > https://bugs.gnu.org/40634#32 > > I'll try to take a look at the later patch. Oh! Glad you spotted that.