bug-gnulib@gnu.org mirror (unofficial)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Jay K <jayk123@hotmail.com>
Cc: Gnulib bugs <bug-gnulib@gnu.org>, 49269-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49269: gzip tru64 64bit time_t
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 20:14:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <934b4ef4-26be-4eec-5ba4-542b8ee185b0@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR1401MB195175300CE09856208524EBE6029@MWHPR1401MB1951.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>

On 6/29/21 2:21 AM in <https://bugs.gnu.org/49269>, Jay K wrote:

> checking for 64-bit time_t... no
> configure: WARNING: This package requires a 64-bit 'time_t' type if there is any way to access timestamps outside the year range 1901-2038 on your platform. Perhaps you should configure with 'CPPFLAGS="-m64" LDFLAGS="-m64"'?
> 
> 
> https://github.com/jaykrell/cm3/blob/master/m3-libs/m3core/src/m3core.h
> suggests how:
> 
> #ifdef __osf__
> /* Request 64bit time_t. Not available on v4. Would be good to autoconf this.
>   * We later check for TIMEVAL64TO32/TIMEVAL32TO64 to see if this works.
>   */
> #ifndef _TIME64_T
> #define _TIME64_T
> #endif
> #endif /* osf */

As I understand it, on Tru64 defining _TIME64_T does not make time_t 64 
bits; it merely makes visible the type time64_t and related functions 
time64, localtime64, etc. So if we wanted to support 64-bit time_t on 
Tru64, we'd need something like this:

#define _TIME64_T
#define time_t time64_t
#define time time64
#define localtime localtime64
...

which sounds error-prone. And since Tru64 doesn't seem to have a stat64 
call, it wouldn't work for programs that need to use stat and similar 
syscalls.

Given that there's little chance to getting this sort of thing to work, 
and that Tru64 is no longer supported (HP dropped support in 2012) I 
doubt whether it's worth worrying about this problem for gzip, so I'll 
close the bug report. You can simply ignore the configure-time warning 
from now until 2038 (when Tru64 stops working for lots of other 
reasons). However, I'll cc. this email to bug-gnulib in case someone 
else can think of a better way to get this to work on this obsolete 
platform.


           reply	other threads:[~2021-07-04  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <MWHPR1401MB195175300CE09856208524EBE6029@MWHPR1401MB1951.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=934b4ef4-26be-4eec-5ba4-542b8ee185b0@cs.ucla.edu \
    --to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=49269-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=bug-gnulib@gnu.org \
    --cc=jayk123@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).