Hi Bruno, Bruno Haible writes: > Now it has completed, and it turned out you were confusing the license > texts in text format (which ought to be added to VCS directly) and the > license texts in Texinfo format (for which gnulib modules are > appropriate). Well I didn't include the GFDL in plain text format in my package. I only included it in Texinfo format, but Ineiev accepted my package nevertheless. I think the Texinfo format licenses are human readable enough that it is sufficient to just include those. In fact, it seems this is what Gnulib itself does. But as Ineiev points out, the modules are valid for two of the three methods described in (gnulib) VCS Issues. So I think instead that the documentation should be updated. See the patch to update the documentation below. I added an anchor, VCS Omissions, under the VCS Issues node in gnulib-tool.texi. I think that since the relevant material is slightly far down on the page, if I link directly to VCS Issues, it could cause confusion. However, feel free to remove the anchor if you see fit. I also fixed a minor issue where "VCS" ended with "." rather than "@." (see (texinfo) Ending a Sentence).