From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on starla X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C54CF1F44D for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 23:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=ejgoGMmI; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0003 header.b=rFLK9Z/j; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzPv3-0008Jg-VF; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:51:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzPv2-0008JT-F7 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:51:24 -0400 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.162]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzPv0-0001OQ-1n for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:51:24 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1713916279; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=ser8yxw5YQaAx6eC00cxf86zfx7WVZmlZ6Tk9UMmNcIbDM8u/anOY5aAfR3hdiJCDo Fas5sxXeoihp6UYYzPBfLbdposxjSOkkzb33tguy2Tw78/COhhCegqQitZ43/q8U2+sI A2QtbTatYvz8gN9HbtEuzo9/BELx6bpCX3VRtlfmNS8qAEedKimoK26j/UlFQifSvZKu URcV4XA7IWNbI1lHrh4yTpqjfslG3UrhPcwwIfNvjfB5+/ZpdCZnPE8fsfyMDhpD6HhC liXSQaUwSyokWSGpxe6dGYGV08oA8EohsdZSgo7qFDKcqhEjzxW1hYD7iXVSmtDvDAcv ej4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713916279; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=2DyVptTba4DwYo8812Ua8myYO05A/in0GBeDzXg6UzE=; b=YpBaOoWXI1sF+27lMuddJzdGST55CxlLmHXcb6nT3jOW5l3c7+BvPVE/KB4F13Svsa KkjKiuB5TMoB5UlKRCcFpXq3e17nKJeWqRJKXfi/QYGVFc/fogpFpO68JIPTkeMIT8aw d+DkIxWbw8WuHH+7cDUU7a9YYdDVzLeIti6EAi37yEvzyJ//d6y1i/GMoEzowekGHcRJ LS/gUEatHfuaCQHotg+OK9UOej+9gOqE3lKLFuDVpvEvCRb3C8CvyldQjX7SLCjHEoHF gGXoqHoYuJDEgAmRszU4/HbyJXA0N3/eZAfEGoPfR4Z0K8xCLDzZIrCnVJpnhHgpIOOP Uo7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713916279; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=2DyVptTba4DwYo8812Ua8myYO05A/in0GBeDzXg6UzE=; b=ejgoGMmIsp8yKrYbgM8B4NBCBVKBo3nw0zGdDZcAj+CgK8sxgkH0Pzre+1XLbA3ypy R1MtMWplLZozaPEuonUtwI5ywMV4atR1L/g9tv9iCxW9JqmTVK46MeF8zpmcul7mW8wL PTl+A0JWsJoHlzCNqqqmKdxkhj1c/sLcJXVUk1Kb7v0AiXZxIWCatp8AJ+k9s9DapwZt QcQ4S7TJdNzZbM/aWZQ8xEw9g/toiAsSRT1VphCEozMsibm0+DYNuG22NZzxXnd8zEWL UnRMKt4JyJewa8tLiXZluPZAD4UOIxl3HO4kkb+H0cxZC4KIBc1f3lMcjBXDPa2JpWJ2 an2w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713916279; s=strato-dkim-0003; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=2DyVptTba4DwYo8812Ua8myYO05A/in0GBeDzXg6UzE=; b=rFLK9Z/jNRNmwHL5m5lAAM9vA1TF/QsNNHBPd1xUezFDMtbxHOt1ducqjeCWlo350u IPXknhl35jxT1YdE2zBQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpPCj6ef5YonVenGZbWa/xLP/lf/" Received: from nimes.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 50.5.0 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id Ndd2ca03NNpJ1oV (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Wed, 24 Apr 2024 01:51:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: Reuben Thomas Cc: bug-gnulib Subject: Re: Gnulib in Debian Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 01:51:19 +0200 Message-ID: <8477763.soENF2aIni@nimes> In-Reply-To: References: <346536552.tGq8MHzOUc@nimes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.162; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Reuben Thomas wrote: > (not yet in Debian, sadly, as they don't like me "vendoring gnulib", as FTP > Master calls it, or "using gnulib as other packages like Enchant do, and as > designed", as I call it). I assume you are alluding to the mail thread that starts at ? I haven't read the thread. But you write: "I am the upstream maintainer of libpaper ..., and also a Debian Maintainer trying to get a new version of libpaper into Debian." Is the problem something that affects the package upstream, or only something that is specific to Debian? In the latter case, I don't want to interfere with that. Distros package the software like they want to. Debian, in particular, has hundreds of pages of policy documents. It's not my business as an upstream maintainer to interfere with that. (*) Bruno (*) Except when there's a copyright infringement, like it happened in the Oracle Solaris downstream distribution of GNU libsigsegv. I had to write them, so they stopped doing that.