From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 713481F47C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 23:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=pAkf6x5y; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIeXo-0002kL-QO; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:42:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIeXn-0002kA-Mn for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:42:07 -0500 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.23]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIeXl-0001aI-Bz for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:42:07 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1674171708; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=Ivlk+R/Y/nmqJjZSrai9l1pepXPcXfww/ENqo0GHbft057ktgpv93wm0cW8OlqN9Ly teONnnoIz1IxlWjjkPTNjIcB1Re5DxHRguK4s658ayY03uCgPKtyHvL+ypVNAipcnkRv WEOF9yRRpB2EQYFf/lwX9bUZEuZJbVM5K9xV3SGiLN3o6Pg/HDptm5kZNFpCN/SwrlLc vWBt8CU7je/6iGiF0wXH9bfIqOVBVM/I6vfRKFKWWHU+eDu3QKP7jIVCjbrkIHiPsntq IFKhjTq6UoMh9NHufp3GhXK6d4vEIuN8qFUm2nmhgh/SpiwIiM4K2BLc7vu9+DmtyV12 qMnA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1674171708; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=bJsPzwN72hNn4XLaFVZdcT6Eu7H86JLj6n5zReOuDEA=; b=HEUB4NSvUeiCuCBrrybX96jwCSKby8xyqxARt/XnoZted651m3ifFzh+VAi52bFjdb i1/3q2NUwDkrn/Wofq3MBTfB2NcT8UvdOBky5koKvlfikvy9zeUa6JmEPWVpZ28rVD7W 5jWh8n8dKJl50EpMKY8o6CiVwc/79/YqU9h6Saq5SIdoL7J9chghewrgVMpHutEIT75M g/ABb4IC5yLWwUZvodquXnxq3DgrE5sj/pSsfXBo5nC/4PKVRXmMvlxZ6Kdh5U5VquyF 3pPUIYeQqGuX5dgTmr6DOUQCCBW3DGHWWmS6Ps3GlYDUGKHyQsE4c9KZ1eiKvzHNkMeW GM4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1674171708; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=bJsPzwN72hNn4XLaFVZdcT6Eu7H86JLj6n5zReOuDEA=; b=pAkf6x5yY7pTNFl7fBCRUeuwvtqaRlmM6StOSQz8zp7nmGypc26+9V4f0HQuxfuVdU dn+uNeL40YTpTXbdDcD38VmWqOL89HkQuvnlu/E3SztZip3OcqUsQoELaMOGzn2p4uDa tvF5G7AL8PJyKHd+7W/QHqiSjmtH+qFD794nuhmuFTh9p+x2Pbql1iWd4h+5/MHexzcb lBBsOSckLp3bJZ3wJFCUvE2GPxZnuBe8lVFwGXNZyw2ma6tXvzFENSYgiJ6e7ztpbVXn +gQV5e90/A9YWzkceRWiyoBUEnMBCrtTTLE33dvlMK8MXp2RNjbh9SKYAbGPTOGzShN+ WMzw== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpPC26ZQUKtWYykHs0wzofYtj5a2QQ==" Received: from nimes.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 49.1.0 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id w8066ez0JNfm1GR (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:41:48 +0100 (CET) From: Bruno Haible To: Simon Josefsson Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, Jim Meyering , Paul Eggert Subject: Re: fts: Document this module Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:41:47 +0100 Message-ID: <8008067.n2SeQjunJ6@nimes> In-Reply-To: <87r0vqhzku.fsf@josefsson.org> References: <56097987.UDWvV4KDcT@nimes> <87r0vqhzku.fsf@josefsson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.215.255.23; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org > The gnulib fts is different from glibc API, and they can return > different results when called the same way. See end of earlier thread > here: >=20 > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-07/msg00070.html Thanks for the heads-up, Simon. > I'm not sure what could be done. Perhaps adding a sentence to the > gnulib documentation stating that the gnulib fts is not a drop-in > replacement for missing fts functionality but a separate implementation > with different behaviour. I'm not sure about what to write either. Jim or Paul, what should we state =E2=80=94 either in the 'fts' module description, or in the .texi documenta= tion? Bruno