From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on starla X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299241F44D for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 00:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=TnWc/n3m; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0003 header.b=NF9tOXP9; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvo5F-0007WL-DG; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:51:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvo5D-0007UV-E7 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:50:59 -0400 Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.165]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvo5B-00054b-JZ for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:50:59 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1713055853; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=ce5gwP+f9Dl+28pHZawUCUzNH4DU42h6nqSeqq2ZBUNxN97CxwQXZp964tofpTFgbg tQT9fQEeMNiAr4CEuXJ2PZChC0qUjaA4838HKP97TOQACvva7vj9XCs5iF5SgDL/IEon 1E8OaPeOYCR3WxDZpaawm01Khc8japOPh+zPWlwBXevficaznoPecL3jmi1N6rMszDPA DsOG5IWQbk1jTIhsX5E+dMxV7jUg0IWOGe6BonKdMrPbd/QMGCrJat7IgZ36oUJr3PsB 3V+W2Bqe4d/1HWSGZMGpRwgG4osTnUuKFpK+m7IoTnbjU2QwuqZCCcNhSox3x0gXsHOq +mJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713055853; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=H+6MxOCkmmqkH62O5mkGtYEfPuD10Inf9fs+H/Ixfsw=; b=hNVlOaxRKjVwN5NY8ISwu5J6OLychxpKeFquhemj/L4K4V2BGoX1e3Pi7+fK7tP4AT ihwTFoyZSguFLx1SiugFI+ERChAbOj+htQOZ8fQ1mD7HSXs0ew4JeHH5Ifa6+kVS8ZS2 6xyZrk8d9XDxCJ4O0XM9Jrlb8kBpfHQCUpVClxkxrXKc0WbOJuqK7TSh9P6pt/JPz4Gu 5dTE3uMDQ23DwjM3X+wJvoWLWRm2eqG0jmVI9OOLB2HVA3kireLs0fW9X5/JZjcKq8gE Yofq1w+iqOl/RL8nK6Rko8nzkP0Sy0xJRi7vzN4wqIONsFfz9PKUry0Yk7ilJVMu/nBd /Ayg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo01 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713055853; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=H+6MxOCkmmqkH62O5mkGtYEfPuD10Inf9fs+H/Ixfsw=; b=TnWc/n3mHYVoghNHwOPgrWqKNVMFylFAqA3cSoRPJE7ixZrsRMGwXeI3azbZ/Ai3CS cwmOQ4Ki6nUz6FzV4FyUP357niswLijw81dEk7ajFonOPrni/yWvjJ5sqtvQZIaKqFxS iJvTLn6CGJF9eT3vPS0hhscFJ2OS9a2vwjKG3iSO4S7UIMKFcMOEdHStevA1rtdnkXUb dic43gE/q7dlnNV/rpXH8cYLlRjGic0MakKs7NlaVsWTtKqWo/xr4fLZxYykrN3VBQKi XAWhJDE0anKkvgtf3M12lVeftrwrQvt+3VkYp/ccd/xArkTGS5/OVoa047tzb+M6CJqE KKqA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713055853; s=strato-dkim-0003; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=H+6MxOCkmmqkH62O5mkGtYEfPuD10Inf9fs+H/Ixfsw=; b=NF9tOXP9n2y++BIbuejHEXkR+JxM+9vmDlqUIToBlCRswFxmVbMN+j/9CpMtphdfso 9WjN8DUADpFPWhjwZFAw== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpOQ2aBbMZXs0qeHh9o4fr7Y6SHg3Q==" Received: from nimes.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 50.3.2 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id N8610003E0orfhx (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sun, 14 Apr 2024 02:50:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Cc: Collin Funk Subject: Re: hash_delete safe to remove? Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 02:50:53 +0200 Message-ID: <52700683.3TNR287u6W@nimes> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.165; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Collin Funk wrote: > A month or two ago I updated gnulib in GNU patch to fix some build > failures. I also noticed some deprecation warnings from 'hash_delete' > and changed them to 'hash_remove'. > > I forgot to ask here, but should this be removed now? Has there been an official 'patch' release that includes the change, already? If not, it's too early: Some people (or distros) like to take the git checkout of the latest release and rebuild the generated files with the newest gnulib. There will be some things to update, sure (like the 'execute' argument list). But the fewer problems there are, the better. Even if we don't promise that there are no problems. In other words: Each backward-incompatible change (-> mentioned in the NEWS file) can trigger problems. Let's try to minimize the trouble. Bruno