From: Collin Funk <collin.funk1@gmail.com>
To: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>, bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Python 'strings'
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 11:05:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bac5936-0d49-4283-be3d-618479814c77@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5722403.o0KrE1Onz3@nimes>
Hi Bruno,
On 2/25/24 4:02 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> * The Python interpreter prints strings with single-quotes:
>
> >>> "abc"
> 'abc'
>
> So, that makes the single-quotes the natural choice.
Interesting find. I don't have super strong feelings on the matter. I
just think that it is best that code is consistent. I'm more used to
"abc", but since nearly all of the exist code uses 'abc' I agree that
this choice is better.
Thanks,
Collin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-25 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 5:23 [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 27 Collin Funk
2024-02-23 13:08 ` Bruno Haible
2024-02-23 22:20 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-23 23:51 ` Bruno Haible
2024-02-24 2:36 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-24 5:49 ` gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 28 Collin Funk
2024-02-24 23:25 ` gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 27 Bruno Haible
2024-02-25 0:03 ` Dima Pasechnik
2024-02-25 11:57 ` Python != None Bruno Haible
2024-02-25 19:29 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-25 20:07 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-26 20:38 ` pycodestyle configuration Bruno Haible
2024-02-26 21:31 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-26 22:54 ` Bruno Haible
2024-02-27 0:51 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-27 2:38 ` Bruno Haible
2024-02-27 4:22 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-25 20:55 ` Python != None Dima Pasechnik
2024-02-25 12:02 ` Python 'strings' Bruno Haible
2024-02-25 19:05 ` Collin Funk [this message]
2024-02-24 23:42 ` gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 28 Bruno Haible
2024-02-25 0:47 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-25 1:18 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-25 1:25 ` Bruno Haible
2024-02-25 3:32 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-26 20:51 ` Bruno Haible
2024-02-28 11:51 ` Collin Funk
2024-02-28 12:14 ` Bruno Haible
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4bac5936-0d49-4283-be3d-618479814c77@gmail.com \
--to=collin.funk1@gmail.com \
--cc=bruno@clisp.org \
--cc=bug-gnulib@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).