From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C931F47C for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 15:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=UPJOpTOp; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLn07-0007xq-Tf; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:20:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLn06-0007xf-Cx for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:20:18 -0500 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.162]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLn03-0004DX-Vk for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:20:18 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1674919212; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=f0mTtPEJhNiNz88sA1IvB15eUmJUc17euH5ocu5BV1rcVSQvqdNrF58fdX2JcPZzxY ecq/MViKWDkO+1Wh+zE+33YnzOO3JPTFuwggSu4z6cEwE6cbHHP/RjP+NXF3Ojhbx1RP 0fnmlncpjn2SgOPDN3VziKwF5Ou2ZBdFDtrBBzH8Ngc/1wQ319uMWSFxJhtqadSB0sCr 6gS553MQv6Jj+2kvO6R+m5kQB+6s/6DtFzL7HENG8E4ZA4RseA+z3XokkvY5uSj3FXcI R2Gn5h9E2sB+d0YgbS/n1mBmjhnDeU/sq49FjbIzAMrsvGOtYtfDo7uuL/Vv30mOxd1O EkXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1674919212; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=a1fXjQjSSnAYBQXz6RBcOSDVz+AP3Wydtr85+4SxHLU=; b=dIEy7m1fZupvL7OxQvCtDaXMOATkWa1F1kFpMSPKeDSH6mBjnVmJPCptb5wjUXSIKL jWFBw7M8AHLFQ7N7SRwkn95aZqP7LBvmd+K97nhVGBUM4OuKYQ3cJcWHFPNqzMd0ED17 9pUAghCRxmaiinCgYaP8w6bgA+icdYxHpOIJOUW1HcnTzW4i2IohZJBl/+BEoU2htQSI tYwr3QamJdVT+sXB0aYBlOEqSSseNbrn+I7myzHOoGIZAU2U4QatfypcVt/7WalculBw 7GWxP0uoDgSn5WfO+8uxS0wFsA+3LbMSQGq/rRTWFD6GO/m0czOkZUX3rDWyljjs7sEs 6K3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1674919212; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=a1fXjQjSSnAYBQXz6RBcOSDVz+AP3Wydtr85+4SxHLU=; b=UPJOpTOpZhChqM8qoG22Aubgdz/9nVD4yFLSI4oSyjqN5THDWARqQNEfnO9m8k+NHN TQo4N9sgQOV/2iWrmB5TeGCIONGx9CSKpUjLaXJJZ84sAqOYF2JW+p00Py9Bu3f3B5M7 vOR7Ue/3ffDkvAwOJavhzzoNJXOpoEKV99H3e/FK/S6flHg21Ia+dfrrbOP7GeXPAaz8 YvJzqEsf5rzuQ1ayjZJ1xfjMueMe56lE+OTv18bONNeZEhOp1N0xbn6sPiTZog16FQf+ bfEQhyDnWDdi9lrMaGC0NwPGhspwpKQru82ESbpd/H+JvozqhIO1YB8uaI10Oag1DHtH W0TA== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpPDjvwA7022TV+YfjovfFy3RIl4" Received: from nimes.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 49.2.2 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id 098542z0SFKCNK8 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:20:12 +0100 (CET) From: Bruno Haible To: "(GalaxyMaster)" Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Subject: Re: filevercmp incompatible change? Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:20:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4598695.WzN2syfzKT@nimes> In-Reply-To: <01000185f8e2b1b4-becc9439-2f82-4857-a302-55cda9e1574e-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <01000185f8e2b1b4-becc9439-2f82-4857-a302-55cda9e1574e-000000@email.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.162; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Hi, (GalaxyMaster) wrote: > I think the following commit introduced a behavioural change that was not > intended: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=1ba2b66ea45f9bc43cdc0f6f93efa59157d2b2ba The patch modified a unit test. This means that the change was intended. Also it was discussed in this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2022-06/msg00019.html and accompanied with a coreutils change: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=0ae619f3495dd9456e4a58226e16d3260b623a78 Bruno