From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on starla X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1FB1F44D for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=ZyXrLsQ2; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0003 header.b=qoXj7k8j; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzM6b-0007DK-JC; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:47:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzM6P-0007D1-V7 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:46:54 -0400 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.216]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzM6O-0001FJ-7p for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:46:53 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1713901608; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=di1mDPss7S8tRhEKWZ8w+/cd0RBnF5M1f3RYUCr1jGRsS11DVvvONNkE/aq+6j97pu 2h3yArYe/sv8p1uoHMGudIAAMAdOy1EenKt484glon4Vrq7dyEmuFncFUDLELLSwN6NQ Nmj8XXvJIsKOE4t5DEuPE2AE8LUPh/n3nDcqW823kYdd7KhEd8Aq+Van8VzJ/RGo6PAi clLWNtXouyhEuDfYlCJVDEDzQ8z1iiBFIKiaIzSn7DagtWzKOqTt+P5GAi9PtNm37qOt bhdYdskE18+OtqMW90t0bA3utXAeeYTc9VDZjPty6GX90ySEgv+I49G4XFeC4QKQWcGB 9ZEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713901608; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=SjPfpn3tZYNsb5EVRqdUQ8ncYm+fhEXUhQwfrIp2X+c=; b=LdTuPrZ8rlkw6ceL55j3mJH72miMD6iwib2dDRLJMP+HbChV+QIuTXGQh3CNyVEAzQ JTCJuLcrrUWe2LEEobYzp807q6Ihwl7JaHJ8KBQjoY4jMQ2XuN/YQzmeSOYQDorbLXgh fNcMxDiqHiRVOIwqejm2wb8dj4brUjvkIlHATj5C/XTQvT0IsN8z6g7KbSy7JJxRvT6W Ld942KKjqEsk1qhiAZch2rkFOPB5RgCcU2Ff+lWBLQJbTtYaVztpnAvoCCb8oRqicxni JrJ448KCtPIY/cvlgxxV17XsobuaKmLoFPrw18Wx36Oqb50sZf/qs+18w5bVUtdmc4yg C0cA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713901608; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=SjPfpn3tZYNsb5EVRqdUQ8ncYm+fhEXUhQwfrIp2X+c=; b=ZyXrLsQ2ukrHNONAfAwmVgepsfKYuh1htGaFRliRkNVNSHfdBliosaKnJFiG3mulS+ BF/sWjd5vudouhZLrBJmI3jkpfI5zauAdBwXiKxGUx8KpxfJNPYoZVJq8hzGEU2whwz+ zhV/wnVlq11uifWeL99qaDccwhGEcePy5HKSJuTyE8xPvtCCblGnTHtcNiKmhKsAVdz/ tXrmc0ouskIsMEiCtgneg0+NeJqCQODyGWz0pOd4jvaT4hlFdosCKydhBS6ssmRcFsJB 5OuF6bLZ2ju+SvPpGIF+2yAYB0tFTvK0ijBgUnSUJxYO0UTezwGKceKCVvuM8AhppzMU ojqw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713901608; s=strato-dkim-0003; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=SjPfpn3tZYNsb5EVRqdUQ8ncYm+fhEXUhQwfrIp2X+c=; b=qoXj7k8jslujAJnb12njIthmN1VTwoqSlAfSynLkfaBXBRyhRoJK8X+ItJ0sgJDvT0 GASvLCLmAyhklfX6O1Cw== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpPCj6ef5YonVenGZbWa/xLP/lf/" Received: from nimes.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 50.5.0 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id Ndd2ca03NJkm1Y7 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:46:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: bug-gnulib Cc: Reuben Thomas Subject: Re: 'relocatable' project built without --enable-relocatable Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:46:48 +0200 Message-ID: <346536552.tGq8MHzOUc@nimes> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.216; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Reuben Thomas wrote: > Could macros be similarly added for the other relocatable.h > APIs, namely set_relocation_prefix and compute_curr_prefix? This would > allow relocate-using code to be entirely #ifdef free. How does or would the code you are talking about look like, with #ifs? And would it be code for a library, or for a program? I'm asking because no package I know of is using set_relocation_prefix explicitly [1], nor is it documented by Gnulib [2]. Bruno [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=+set_relocation_prefix+-path%3Arelocatable.c+-path%3Arelocatable.h+-path%3Aconfigure&literal=1&page=1 [2] https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/Supporting-Relocation.html