From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3931F47C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 00:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=Q5SDO6je; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJNwl-0005RM-TA; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 19:10:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJNwj-0005Qt-7E for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 19:10:53 -0500 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.160]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJNwh-0007vl-JI for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 19:10:52 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1674346239; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=iFyUocnNp280gJrBaKwyq2YkJsBMYxi3sX/MnylVsv6AjM1mQ4pdaAGZ/XynI/UnGk CXRT/e6Q5ouYxCV3c7zeBaxbOHwDvbVTpzBsVdA7sgbMpox1NiSXHKnuili+IRHxHfYo JBaRL1wct2ESmpB1tzLzMlJlWLvp8SFs1wphXWfF56fPxtIOJNEtEZD7Wfd3bj06OWPV p1ba9gHDP/t9SMX/CX4L5bMUphCO8ZXwzquGEbHzZ0bRxnIugdcD1tQRZHIK+eFd5kYF JCu2oY2iW3dTmO/4ALEinZPa1tpXrWqU9zCjT7q9DwC6ms9y/3XrMrRLQF12Hl3vVyLx Hl5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1674346239; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=ueclaVvZvSMRQWYr8Y5xE62Yf5LGHeKRZFpLUOKrmEg=; b=Mt+JwCRbgD273ayafxs8HeBgN5Th/HJg1xGPYoxQ10TIvEY+1oLuukr7d/ANStEUip uHj5bieBflMQXK5NoDVzH9QPK49XfrX4L4DJQbsmF5all7BmuLd5DpkvfwfQdhJfxULu s7Zd0dxhtzFm1QP0UZn80XUoiqtUusq2UNurN8xRNeHddpWilgxO654F1xmN1pGohN9U 0PeSMC6qNpYSwP1/6zYemozW0BcW7v5xnRNPG/TJYDDNzA2/N0WrfIDM6PW3P/PhYY8S /jYn05CgGTcgcMBbfc/PcK02TckrklVWUmq8krPSQAatJV2z31wXeZgP9L7jgfCwbFY0 z2ng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1674346239; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=ueclaVvZvSMRQWYr8Y5xE62Yf5LGHeKRZFpLUOKrmEg=; b=Q5SDO6je5uJaIpeKNz9WmduLvlMRoq4YxEv78Y+nxAh3Ok0uYUvTZmyHBS7z3DGLmH e5NVpwNAFRDNy5QIYOJw2+SW+dAOa5okKznx/R3icrrwp8t5pe4pMDjbeyHe9g9B8YDs II2nq3PKWyhAY+rooxmVpcqu8CSzOBnnEaCJfSzk5E6HCSGy/1tRfv9N6zFqkiMMbTnq SAn4I90WpoGBgBcGVGD5tWFNz25UiRYxILQzhh+buZemPR3F47P97hF+TXayldER4mwy MbHFS3DBbemHvjwNYvdzn/pvE4jIGro0GNKVpnjdv7rSCp4yodhgt/DbKsQKJ6+d+ieH sLrg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpOS3PGC+J+dqbCJC2jREvQqEnTq" Received: from nimes.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 49.1.0 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id w8066ez0M0Ad8e8 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sun, 22 Jan 2023 01:10:39 +0100 (CET) From: Bruno Haible To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, Paul Eggert Subject: Re: getprogname: Move declaration from "getprogname.h" to Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 01:10:38 +0100 Message-ID: <3365185.MIaLTWTXVN@nimes> In-Reply-To: <92099878-2f9b-846d-151d-cccdb9cdd59f@cs.ucla.edu> References: <2228587.e3iEh8JYqD@nimes> <92099878-2f9b-846d-151d-cccdb9cdd59f@cs.ucla.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.160; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Paul Eggert wrote: > I ... wouldn't object to a very short transition period Short transition periods tend to cause unnecessary hassle to some users. I therefore favour 1 year or 2 years as a transition period. > since the current #warning is something I would treat > like a diagnostic that getprogname.h is missing. I don't understand. Is the #warning that I added misleading? Then, by all means, please provide a better message. (The compiler typically reports the location of the warning; so, from the compiler's diagnostic it should be clear that there still is a getprogname.h. No?) Bruno