From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E061F5AE for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39584 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqVK3-0000tR-T8 for normalperson@yhbt.net; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 02:34:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqVJm-0000pp-Me for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 02:34:30 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:28402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqVJk-00025N-VG for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 02:34:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623134068; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hLo1SjWDGFv9M72EJl0Kt31zdKrlwfpr+/TuCe7oGCU=; b=jCDnDo6ZD9nGvGp0UCjfVc04qYhYL3S14tyQBld9py1vfdg/FoqvsV7bKO+H11g7aVG/Rd CfCuIo3Tpv15ss/WHWClra/kHvsetcJLLXdWNerHEV7lNLIva73hZlhLIl7B2k0b2qdLWW 2YTpHOTWSUryRVU41yBhPRgjgN0Uflo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-586-LB9_A1KlOjKdniWmdKqhng-1; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 02:34:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LB9_A1KlOjKdniWmdKqhng-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75819801B1D; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nbkamil.localnet (unknown [10.43.7.71]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD80F10023B0; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:34:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Kamil Dudka To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig?= Brady Subject: Re: [PATCH] mountlist: recognize fuse.portal as dummy file system Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 08:34:22 +0200 Message-ID: <2600622.mvXUDI8C0e@nbkamil> In-Reply-To: References: <20210607124303.7136-1-kdudka@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kdudka@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=kdudka@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" On Tuesday, June 8, 2021 12:16:36 AM CEST P=E1draig Brady wrote: > On 07/06/2021 13:43, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > This was originally proposed at: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-02/msg00053.htm= l > >=20 > > As the full review might take some time, would it be possible to apply > > at least the part related to fuse.portal file systems? They started to > >=20 > > cause problems recently: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal/+bug/= 190 > > 5623 > > https://github.com/muesli/duf/issues/35 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1913358 > >=20 > > --- > >=20 > > lib/mountlist.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >=20 > > diff --git a/lib/mountlist.c b/lib/mountlist.c > > index f5d1364c1b..e4c1779829 100644 > > --- a/lib/mountlist.c > > +++ b/lib/mountlist.c > > @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ > >=20 > > || strcmp (Fs_type, "debugfs") =3D=3D 0 \ > > || strcmp (Fs_type, "devpts") =3D=3D 0 \ > > || strcmp (Fs_type, "fusectl") =3D=3D 0 \ > >=20 > > + || strcmp (Fs_type, "fuse.portal") =3D=3D 0 \ > >=20 > > || strcmp (Fs_type, "mqueue") =3D=3D 0 \ > > || strcmp (Fs_type, "rpc_pipefs") =3D=3D 0 \ > > || strcmp (Fs_type, "sysfs") =3D=3D 0 \ >=20 > Pushed. > "fuse.portal" should be fine to always consider as dummy. Thanks! Kamil