From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2887E1F47C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=clisp.org header.i=@clisp.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=FwMXwibO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pGFhs-0002EN-Ja; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 03:46:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pGFhq-0002Ay-FX for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 03:46:34 -0500 Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.52]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pGFho-0005Te-7L for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 03:46:34 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673599584; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=Oq/wcyzsdlY+uM2887ja8ktC4+0r21ibsdZJZZcKfXRnbJRC7w9KHI4AeQWfiKBcTl 5/2rCzbBP0n7ats+3r+Cf+fZLkomtUa5mZr5nft3hA3EGJbbk3twqqvH7JnZnRCGHHsw LBWXajIGTWHUeKwQc9bMAWSwPDbSCWgZbqsqHtVt205HYVXrh7yNpxGHQKLBDlPb82xy q//iL0FrgEvZdZWISsBkQzznrrIHNyflWUit0JbeoDbPlb7nWFpr03rjhMF9wUO6i9bS +EHE6SRufOjfU1o4Losk2tM4+2Dc9SlcDAPJ9YJ8xMcFbXMGZ0oFlLjsysINbyI2YC6J 0j8g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1673599584; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=JffIk9NJnRCIpcWU4En65B0q8cQuymmw7NCUIIIB9As=; b=tXABnEZmBwzuuUagnXW0H/YhiPz1J+4j003Z5BgpDxYPXwQ7S3u29R9hKiZNfJjxm8 i8BfnDxcAIGV0i52oi7WovgpGl0ROGpvZOzUeV/X85xDwPHcoIG5kHJd8c4smL3h/Jro UNANlSsVq4gNsqmUTn+f2yUyphBfja46iyQT/cc4igf+D8Ur1dAWwpuXMDJYouErIwjW 1cheE3TtUr3CpolcXeRC6EDivqjZNEok9qMhj5fwVPVg9UCRJ9YF3esHx3NQhOWknh27 ci/b4hbT7RZo5ssUOKIhqwH899HK8aFYoLku6ocrQHd6zSD5wyX9dTXOSREuBc7FQ/sx T99Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo01 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1673599584; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=JffIk9NJnRCIpcWU4En65B0q8cQuymmw7NCUIIIB9As=; b=FwMXwibOzGSDzycCZWz5uP4SulvWRbhjjN/Bap6OvozkrdVCnDB7tE6P/tPsjCvpvP /dToh1Y4r+cVHtpqZPFBOH1dHjNPXiAGydHRJkScna8NcoPFqnuTmYwza9DDCa/XFbzo zeE8a/UyxHZp6LkYcTPjbLSV8fJslkZ0MH7jPZUmHZMH8mYg5RMJRF6oBAH7NpYf0M1M xS1fy+GsCnjO6UPmwC5K9NDUEjx4hyVmwqEY5vKQQ4+Q6OZVCSQVETAvp6Rj+Z7RXe/m zcsvzhSxMxo+oIIDPdCLToxbugmRqQVBRlcMYLkbnVdAbg1sN1VWtEqRAQI0E0ZPqaPq r6aQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpOXjv2XTu3l95++Pe54Opj0GYzUnQ==" Received: from nimes.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 48.6.2 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id I8f358z0D8kNA7T (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 13 Jan 2023 09:46:23 +0100 (CET) From: Bruno Haible To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, Ondrej Valousek Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use xattr (Linux) in qcopy-acl.c Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 09:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <2566903.LuSK9jv16D@nimes> In-Reply-To: References: <20230104143425.1235741-1-ondrej.valousek.xm@renesas.com> <2683844.dfDbWCQSTr@nimes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.215.255.52; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Hi Ondrej, > To be honest, I did not test the automake stuff, I only tested the functionality via coreutils. Testing via a Gnulib testdir is also necessary: * For testing the module descriptions. When you test via coreutils, you are testing only a specific use. You will rarely detect a missing module dependency when testing via coreutils only. * It encourages adding unit tests to Gnulib. These unit tests in return make it less important to test via coreutils. > In coreutils they have their own xattr.m4 which basically does the same. Then the one in coreutils will have to be deleted, because it conflicts with the one from Gnulib. > Do I need to resubmit another patch with your changes included? For Gnulib, I pushed my change. For coreutils, I don't know what you have submitted so far. Bruno