From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466631F55B for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 18:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39018 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfojR-0000x5-Vf for normalperson@yhbt.net; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:00:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfojM-0000wo-6g for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:00:12 -0400 Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.166]:34551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfojI-0007lt-Hp for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:00:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1591034404; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=70aUESKK1xv1c89892d2eh+GkJPVR2o2m7EFZfJ/rtM=; b=GrqYHiudIFk5mY14EFMpbN1QFwAtNtaQw7g4RulqoHi6YHlpYfD5zYS5/Yu4doNdiM GuliW0kcSI3MVAi1kDfA2SbGrK83Y9u3//biIttN+ZV1KB8O+yl3i8XK00Y5iHWiMHd6 M+d/6lABZwu1r3DSL7Eu/BPFMNjCbvTDEFO9g1zciOs5yyrTA3uaxtJfkRRcghuMGwGH C+1Dc4rZPwSFuFl4GzClV/DbQ96SAXcBEga5MyDu4sEkqYskrUG1dwIweu9uhlI5GUgl YTwBu4tB9TtQKaHDkJKvMXJvZvLDsplWR2ghAZ+T8k82tP1P8wPvMf++W0TqsdPAPyA3 PjOQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOH6fzxfs=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.9.0 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id j03713w51I03GAK (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 20:00:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: Asher Gordon Subject: Re: Remove license modules Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 20:00:03 +0200 Message-ID: <2292820.SIrGmUdg9z@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-177-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <87lflqqqo1.fsf@posteo.net> References: <873685hwin.fsf@posteo.net> <2220768.nsYhcXKFcP@omega> <87lflqqqo1.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.166; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/01 13:50:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Asher Gordon wrote on 2020-05-17: > >> I also fixed a minor issue where "VCS" ended with > >> "." rather than "@." (see (texinfo) Ending a Sentence). > > > > I won't spend time on a single instance of this very minor issue. But if > > you want to submit a patch that fixes all instances of this issue, I'll > > appreciate it. > > See the attached 0001-doc-Change-.-to-.-where-appropriate.patch. It > turns out that there were quite a few instances that should be changed Thanks. I've applied your patch, except for the changes to maintain.texi standards.texi make-stds.texi which I've forwarded to bug-standards. We haven't been paying attention to this detail (write @. instead of . to terminate a sentence that ends with an uppercase letter). Maybe your patch will remind us to do it better in the future. > Also, there were some '.'s that should be changed to '@.' in the license > Texinfo files. I don't know whom to contact to change these. Bruno