From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4316D1F9F3 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 20:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57104 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhe0o-000468-2D for normalperson@yhbt.net; Fri, 14 May 2021 16:02:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhdzu-0002ql-JB for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 16:01:23 -0400 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.219]:23034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhdzq-0000N7-SK for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 16:01:21 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621022475; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=dRNIz7YJGkPuGdjVi7w1M4Saml6LaM8sZXnW2mCqq5JFx6bKgRAs4zoskiOREdk4FE Ta1b5g7fnb6e93cKZ+N4UXaHZCtb5a9jG1uxAcnEaEWIDIlL6CvSt2lTzQ8BbdDJLjaF /bRVWTcbpjraVdm1F0X6pV5mxBe8gecWPaBZc+YivIgSoMxzG+CmE7mxen/Zqez0VYjo 1kp3Y4oIUOSTCRHZnyJt7VjyEagrtH3D4XqUzJL58DQVUvjY+Sm+UirXfLuy2ijtjyfS RQjuJSg1jTAK7oU1jGCzIDh3wjImyfJxoJy+NuEAp+dgdmJQeRLQ6E3zPgwBk0uovBg5 wPGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1621022475; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=y1fK0TgSiS/kHkzUNCBEsPkNoZtIu/Ih+NVMM6LnTZc=; b=LIBWKGEn27Ykuq/99cJn5xucgXk1oedvP1bg9AWhF2VXzrOFcyx4dtpiwI7IJ+/x5u yqmEageGITORgU/KmRueknCXlVFDV/NHTf6f3qlAcxne8MNUTjTTH9v11Ue7T58p68YS rbd/BssV/pE4nASQtDzgi0E/OuodYBvHdhCVrAzgDCgcjhQaDQt/P8pcnQX004zlp0D3 fx3hu7OEpF1FL9Ru94HjmrHEXT5qwV2wWm2f946ZdIhAnGwmt9YhwrBqFYmc+iv6CQ5W /XlvLNzXUF4k0ba3sb6dZDMBQTGc2xAFTtiTXbCKe/GmeIOwnCCirgedCBpFIzFuk6TI dUDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; dkim=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1621022475; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=y1fK0TgSiS/kHkzUNCBEsPkNoZtIu/Ih+NVMM6LnTZc=; b=IT0lrFpXvlev05dUEciw/lV4ayZt/VbI0yppR1HmQr9xS1NRGEGeaYSo+H/3CfCYSk Y+OF3QsJdj6WsFiMFceeOcJDzCLYXzSd8S+70R0FH+Zb1y0GBIkRblNwfHeDQAbrF+DC SK5xzqm+ISoGMuaFkzlxYzYSrfKuE5lkZ7XjsMCB/jO0y0MHbzuc4oy/d2CFkfPb3V2S R6rfa1A3mPJH/kCW1p9g0QTQx7tuLV0YVMDih4ALcvS/HS0I9zQZySy4G+KT5+iafNqO bjUNcykoSKTDzebklTGSipqUdE2nbX+Gqo72OlPVWiFaDh8M4ZtMkBzSzCXLtHNWKRbj xERg== Authentication-Results: strato.com; dkim=none X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOHqf3z5NW" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.25.8 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id I08c4ex4EK1F1KD (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 14 May 2021 22:01:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: Simon Josefsson Subject: Re: [PATCH] valgrind-tests: Better option handling. Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 22:01:14 +0200 Message-ID: <2233396.VZ1ULe7JWd@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-206-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <87o8ddw6ze.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> References: <87lf8hxzxx.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <2293202.2TyCXrTQu3@omega> <87o8ddw6ze.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.219; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Hi Simon, > > Assuming I am a GNU package maintainer and I read this paragraph. How do > > I know whether my package uses the "old serial test harness"? Can I > > determine this by looking at configure.ac? Or at the main Makefile.am? > > I suspect almost everyone is using the parallel test harness now since > it is the default since automake 1.11.3, however I clarified the manual, > does it look okay? Yes, this is clear now. Everyone can now see which test harness their package is using. Mine are indeed using the new (parallel) one :-) Thanks. Bruno