From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C72F1F9FD for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJCd5-0005DE-19 for normalperson@yhbt.net; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:56:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJCd1-0005Cr-Lx for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:56:43 -0500 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.163]:26861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJCcz-0007Kx-Ft for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:56:43 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615197398; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=aNIhN1cTjgP/pRvECjKf0EoAWnXoYckUjM4HWkmb48rAJm/cQH+RqFUidAV1NtuAD/ KsT0CQCOGWbIA+HzT1gfGGQQzzfIVNj2mjc4GkrJXhW3xk6Qg3TbSjNPOvMd4LVjRiKK SHHfprk1cGWvDHjK5CbEpVc5C552N8GzLNlho+M+Wd99UnBRMFhPEyG0l0KGdXTcnwtG SWZWZ2WYWA6gVPfsQ7rkC+vdcbglTKXpNsm1xUl/Nb0h/nsKxY6Jk6c1iI3zvQ6uAydR +eBUxT962X9mMZd0tpl7M1vjnxx0YpdPtk6HBYDr0KBOxbJO/exl9jIBE6ap2QOQZtxw Snlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1615197398; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=eJPftkuYaNbFMfWb3l103SMN7P4JmZsmIfoiPTmliPo=; b=BHA6vDLJOQIOmylljr/0jfvbBnNkFEH5MF2NmBWdmUK9OWzokV4PBPgx+crVO+P3az xsaw7VHAxfmT8iqLJZvzC27G8I2H1j5mFykkLNK2fW1h4Luu7eF5HDAbmEIYmzK76nDb /pOOCoJGQ//ysG9IcppIdBt8Vm0dikhSyTKsGxnk75DcCMbRo+xUSXNPPqRHB+gGSql3 NSteGXVeETQKRb+oX9xF/Qal1e9g1eU0Qgrj19mqfWWjdZGSzGeCmul63wkkl2MnkAKP Wd+JFqFu+v7FTnd0RuJjc1V6q5iT4MgHygnQqVgoW54+oSbrVTQ7Gijjd+hooQ2ctcfn ApSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; dkim=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1615197398; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=eJPftkuYaNbFMfWb3l103SMN7P4JmZsmIfoiPTmliPo=; b=eKF5fgXxWGgjysGzoZDx+lIKcSifsffWO7jYbrm7rItjCDCmp90jCoeZIAipaAL4PY /+wW9KBqZyvs6spYKMDnas0ZiasduEH81ihiTnHxWmJgnVaq0T59rGMaHMowqh3BzvU2 VVFHkiJklezGJyra4Vkok7CqVcqNs/fdkqcp2BO8E0YBnv53P4N2ubEyC+r7fsAz07bG Jhptg8kUHgXPCZmQbwPjSnyCDBv+b7xgeESq5PjeQYo0xOAq6Vs1Q0Ed0JFbSljf342b 324nlE+UHWmctnQAhUKUn+Bgnn2wMBTGdumhPCf2ySSEot918x7HGJ0ntj9ZZPlkRPmy ItHA== Authentication-Results: strato.com; dkim=none X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOHqf3zZdW" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.20.3 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id n0b11fx289ucGSP (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:56:38 +0100 (CET) From: Bruno Haible To: Reuben Thomas Subject: Re: NAME_MAX on MingW Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:56:37 +0100 Message-ID: <2082651.8q7MybBAdd@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-203-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1841389.BC9EOF7Wat@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.163; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Reuben Thomas wrote: > Having looked into this, it seems that the same issues apply to PATH_MAX, > yet gnulib has a pathmax module to define PATH_MAX. What's different in > that case? Most systems have a PATH_MAX, only the Hurd doesn't. Whereas only few systems have a NAME_MAX (musl libc, Cygwin, Haiku). Therefore more existing code uses PATH_MAX. Bruno