From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 208.118.235.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F5B1F405 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 18:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41055 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdIvM-0007u4-IH for normalperson@yhbt.net; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:01:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdIvC-00075I-3U for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:01:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdIih-0000VL-Mh for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:48:22 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f52.google.com ([209.85.210.52]:46635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdIih-0000Ui-IB for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:48:19 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f52.google.com with SMTP id w25so20874875otm.13 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:48:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=AH9DpaMn3/7X7exeGrxWKUfKrv8xnBRnlq9hMFTxupg=; b=a835lLIdNZOAD2jZ81jG5vBgsOnx6K3XeMXpchraPXOe2Ja2d8gwXqo+Vqsw7KW//f nFKaeJvnOMMNsSlxPzNICWr1EZ6mk4wdUS9RcDTW/MvpMHwRGflSUd0Bj0GgXu4fzhpR l6QjhWBegg5xqBmVRIGi4veBxawWBskD4t1hUUb+FcdzcLFq0fVEUnpbRlBdSg2978Ch 56nl5qu5OzrXQFzf8S0tsWl8HQ8ju1Rmt5FwckypV5uGf3uoc8vQ06c0KbQ8bfb8It2j tuYFaPu07QUM+Idk50YiDzwgWbo42KvhZ8brL1fJrEwZBR2fNjEa9N4XxUjOF2goeXGN dVwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfJAF/39io2FX/xqofgGw3i1Jr9hf9M+MbzbrUB3YwMr6Ujmbxb IHu/slfCUoa+nOjiGmKd0N4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7WxvOP1g3rfOzS8ZE9JC4+pU++2CjV8gg5STTcNRdLYZRgE5pGDhpRRG3dTMX+V5Z6t6B43A== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:71c9:: with SMTP id z9mr22750121otj.294.1546105698627; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:48:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from sigabrt.benpfaff.org ([2600:1700:9920:6b60::48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15sm20134581otd.66.2018.12.29.09.48.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:48:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:48:15 -0800 From: Ben Pfaff To: Paul Eggert Subject: Re: new module suggestion: fprintftime-check Message-ID: <20181229174815.GH6178@sigabrt.benpfaff.org> References: <5c116236-dfd7-9bd9-a18e-3e55789ae985@gmail.com> <42958301.nlEivnNqOc@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.210.52 X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, Assaf Gordon , Bruno Haible Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 09:22:17AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > (Using ptrdiff_t is part of my campaign to prefer ptrdiff_t to size_t. While > we're at it, let's change the other size_t args to ptrdiff_t, but I > digress....) Have you said anything about this campaign elsewhere? I'd like to hear more.