From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70DF1F4B4 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43366 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvnkB-0001cF-FT for normalperson@yhbt.net; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 15:43:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvnk8-0001c6-I8 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 15:43:20 -0500 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.22]:29633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvnk6-00048k-JH for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 15:43:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1609620196; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:From: Subject:Sender; bh=w7RFUEdOpxlUDsdzr3D83x8dM1uJDqTO2p0KA+jnQFk=; b=Ai6yTnQ0sTWdRC9eCv/HjnSlUuy+VT45NsRCIb+S8F8lwFW/9N/wOQb1eBmdGr6skC 8c9R/GV/IZr+vlOeLfXbDsQHZvm3+9QwzB3ycGfRqvf3JhRC/vZALEA1pcma1zH2kl7U N6U5ELRrkUZPjPHFneKHZeSjx0lXgOCW7PfXC8081ZqeUswuFKXyytBVpPwBHSNBVzeB wAtbRtI5Ew67Qi7bF8YupQepvFQZrF+5sjP/xebu0ZV7arcEYKUMPjttnuGsdLiOt9wD aX6hsPwfK5O3C+PV3rDsjfos5tpfZrTuc9mYVZPC31ue12WMfkYGLebo+jm5KfEbZrjp RMhA== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOH6f3z/s=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.10.7 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id e012d5x02KhEa0z (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sat, 2 Jan 2021 21:43:14 +0100 (CET) From: Bruno Haible To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Subject: Re: Issues with posix functions on modern macOS/Xcode Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 21:43:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1827966.Sqf4WByit0@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-197-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1748506.D3602SlINW@omega> References: <1748506.D3602SlINW@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.215.255.22; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.118, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Storsj=F6?= Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Hi Martin, > > On macOS 10.15.7 (Catalina) on x86_64, both with Xcode 11.7 and 12.2, the > > following tests fail: > > > > FAIL: test-fprintf-posix3.sh > > FAIL: test-futimens > > FAIL: test-renameat > > FAIL: test-renameatu > > FAIL: test-strsignal > > FAIL: test-utime > > FAIL: test-utimens > > FAIL: test-utimensat > > I can look into these, as I reproduce them with macOS 10.13 already. These are fixed now. > > FAIL: test-dprintf-posix2.sh > > FAIL: test-fflush2.sh > > FAIL: test-fpurge > > FAIL: test-ftell.sh > > FAIL: test-ftell2.sh > > FAIL: test-ftello.sh > > FAIL: test-ftello2.sh These would need debugging on a macOS 10.15 machine. Anyone willing to take this challenge? Bruno