From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC921F461 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 22:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXAs-00027q-Rv for normalperson@yhbt.net; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 18:59:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34361) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXAo-00025L-4g for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 18:59:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXAm-0005SZ-4O for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 18:59:22 -0400 Received: from mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([2a01:238:20a:202:5301::7]:34905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXAi-0005RP-Lf for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 18:59:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1562367554; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=YDNe6/UO88EF2uo6GlXFYba5cGda30tDvDgUCmvepjQ=; b=CU79239Ird5EfAjTeJljNYJ9bzQbAqTpWG5VaZwxGBeSk7KpXiMsiPY4eS01+Qfd5l E2BIc/7JdKz65XbHbsq4C53d+1hIFJVOnxvvP6zWeKvuhKv/vzejkmsaxA91gRn8UeLP XqpDQak3GEuTr642+OZSwE1SYxJwT9mQMmT0Q9tyS7u19PUu66Y1KqpdpVp7t0UGWQlw Uj3Yg8XF6V4b3pTMqd2FSFslRG7Orf9s/UjODnPQ9A+uxngiWsf34DdGzLKrNJUh+XFN uZBnN02a3FUfcDOa5rcDVLYS3wl/FJXqESZ+OgQtiut+laOJQ34E2gjlD625d3Nqr7ln Vfgw== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOGaf0zJZW" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.24 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id v018bcv65MxDVjL (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sat, 6 Jul 2019 00:59:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] areadlink-with-size: guess a lower bound with 0 size Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 00:59:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1771959.urycGr0Odh@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-151-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <7AC7AA2A-EDEA-4A80-9A5A-02FAA2D823EF@whamcloud.com> <5a1b87fe-e265-6b0f-66eb-20ad1ba9c6e5@draigBrady.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a01:238:20a:202:5301::7 X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" P=E1draig Brady wrote: > + areadlink-with-size: guess a lower bound with 0 size The patch looks good to me. Except that now, with the shrink-before-return = in place, the term "lower bound" is no longer appropriate. A better term is probably "Initial memory allocation". Bruno