From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB1A1F55B for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 15:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42202 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc9Y5-0006Kt-G5 for normalperson@yhbt.net; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:25:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc9Y2-0006JO-JZ for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:25:22 -0400 Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([2a01:238:20a:202:5300::6]:22449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc9Y0-0003tQ-F5 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:25:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1590161116; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=s1dJeCZkUoXoziPW9O3gqp53+3FwrXEq1pAZlZVMQ7E=; b=Js24fRAQZnc3Yix72DcMQwgDOusr3XSLLWFePCf3dOnJvzHeOqf285u3moSphiWQ9R xst+dnFzrqyvZMTMM9dCnnpuPnqFDWX8naSXwp8NxIraHzYJ7AT2A1hVw4VbNQQX/37U kKMvaApaoPBPJpKHDoBB/CsuvjdVsQxX+DyL0FdjP6vAzds2ctx/gKMMf/Kxsy15Q6OM 8hSdLCn4Ll36PujCXGLMENwQUugrQRaUTxJJ41xqEqSfcKEuIyLVL2kv3lvNYASfhoca 90q5f8THJtL13tOKA4iEbDPribbc+SErsn3LbJNrfdY6Jtv7tZJsXzsDbkfFGlsVDnzZ 8gTg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOH6fzxfs=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.7.0 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id x0bd30w4MFPFKxV (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 22 May 2020 17:25:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: Tim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=FChsen?= Subject: Re: Fix memleak in getdelim.m4 Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 17:25:15 +0200 Message-ID: <10131976.Az27LhXeeQ@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-177-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1600037.TtxsOjzTvg@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=2a01:238:20a:202:5300::6; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Hi Tim, > Well, all made on the _same_ system (my desktop) with just ~35 minutes > in between. > > Since system updates are made manually, it is _very_ unlikely that I > made an update between the tests. :-) > But yes, I made one test without $CC set (so likely with gcc) and the > other one with CC=clang and CFLAGS=-fsanitize... Then it would be useful to have the config.{cache,log,status} results also for a build where CC=clang but CFLAGS unset. So as to distinguish which differences come from clang vs. gcc and which come from the sanitizers. Each of these differences points to a possible problem in our *.m4 macros. Bruno