From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619391F4B4 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 10:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33318 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSd9y-0007Yg-P6 for normalperson@yhbt.net; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 06:05:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSd9t-0007Wd-P2 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 06:05:37 -0400 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.160]:13737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSd9q-0002f5-5s for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 06:05:37 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617444331; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=dEnEvy8PVR3QzvY/CUteXpwNyqJBobLyLzj/R0KYiaOS+9oy374SzdON2rdz4nKtyK JRL5NvUOQc5YOH3vK2gTa+iYENaK8Q+kY9PMyXLlUVTZrelcCLTWG6x1EEBUkZJzrKMn Cw9lRDGXLkUy/cih1Kyx7GUe3Jzfl12agiEOaIKPgYsuvb9VvkU8SvLu1wuxyDVK09uf cjuwHqgYXhqnKtGy3813+/y/vyuwuNuKmijI+Hq811Q3wgBJP57J3fNo9ndBwYkmmn+G NH85AspxZIQOMbZr1AN8lPiR8N9hywwVBh1Bgewst3nyuiepMWO4gRJAoTzVh7L3vQxo GKDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1617444331; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=JCOoFDBvjrYrlpXv7JSBX5kPDqvH0IxOQ9S9N8L/MuM=; b=aiYP978RUYQNv6xNC5BiIkbk2P9KAX9tQA9/Blo0cfkOgW+KMvbFCRTf2aOvcGmWe7 zdzozL/0uBF/EC4xJ/GSxSTlpJ5miYhCvcOTviP1iJ3Nw+YNhf3p6jLKSLmfwoUKu/Q+ 8vDs7JjE8Z5DvU1nQi8VQF2NngK22D30skGLcxY3Zt6U4qoe1nOKAfkBAtKFTSoi0ixR ivHzRHtCe3QJSNigVu6VD3WxgqSnncqZPfW4Kx9QhGFrg1t3lWyKzWAo+TVfnDCmxUNV ePIbnAx4DMHS5a322eKMz5Wn4HZDpsdMHxpngnI2EutREyQTRWkyK148oU5hIABJao6X DPCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; dkim=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1617444331; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=JCOoFDBvjrYrlpXv7JSBX5kPDqvH0IxOQ9S9N8L/MuM=; b=WAOMjr6mC3msumqEJTABuuOuFWu+W/dn3lLcUGYlemN45KRAIcb+2QsK06LQto6/LN J6qvEdHdKRDn/dSJrYLCN3tkFkNdeXtkDbp/V+5b8KqZjWdeGas05TVM2PtnqQbk6Cbb YbkGgqvmVSfgfzV8pG9C/QtiIiGaYlMwmDfbLRvVeDShklXse73gifVJfiA2od3hFmMD FH2fTjvxkfSsWIGsvQNxlpDktqApB+wG0MqvpOQiUGLfjaLZuSHUiHhbatMQbVPwAB8T l3JmJ+0107ahNUeF8natFcyl6o9Q6ZDTbBBtli7D+ThJbKBXsAUGp4SwIuCMOAJA88eg nZ3A== Authentication-Results: strato.com; dkim=none X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOHqf0y5JW" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.23.1 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id z01445x33A5Vayx (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:05:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: Marc =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nieper=2DWi=DFkirchen?= Subject: Re: Autogenerated header files not included in .gitignore Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 12:05:30 +0200 Message-ID: <10049892.57pkqbTAZb@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-206-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1884356.MhiIEz5669@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=81.169.146.160; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Hi Marc, > If Gnulib is going to be extended to support the second option as well That's what I'm suggesting, because the second way to manage files appears to be the majority one. > I am not yet sure how. The problem is that the same source tree would have to > support both options to support both kinds of developers. No, when .gitignore lists all built files, this holds for all developers. In a project where some developers want the first approach and some want the second one, the built files need to be listed in the .git/info/exclude file, not in .gitignore. But since .git/info/exclude is not shared among developers, it is tedious for every developer to maintain their own .git/info/exclude list. Therefore I don't think this "mixed" model is widely used. Bruno