From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 74.125.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB9220705 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id w12so46516880wmf.0 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f/UDPGBkQkbwCkf5sHQz/ANI6qck5R5YjQFDAcfaakM=; b=un0o0Av7u11ZrBq/W37Ecsvh5wFPu3YpMJZJXhhjqlgaYqdWfHmN81SCyvM+rZA9RY orqTN9E+knUkf+j6OVlNVpZyX58xj0w/vKtVgytsAtXcK4ifFOzF7Sid9zLD22isO98E 0dL3utd1C5NW8Rc2r8LJgzLtYOpS8A33IDPaYVudd+cmNtiocFs8GpLj4qEfl0kahbam 9ORaRVdu4NB4blA6I5tpGVuHOj8Hq5k9ZAsySU3Ep6O/C1dC6G1XNYZxSCBT0bcPmPZ7 MnmhSsb+7oX0zOC+FBeUlp6gzpMcpABkdizU/BTVaGkt1GDisW6GZltvtHfntZWm/xzp weaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f/UDPGBkQkbwCkf5sHQz/ANI6qck5R5YjQFDAcfaakM=; b=gS6S3d/fXnu6rlRYaF+4/5YXEY5FZRl5CQX+rry8DA4Ruo4n4lIgHyiOD7/CuKgEXS iR3yZHWM/ERb9FfFqx4nDsb9tleGl1cYnnyZa/cTyZPJ3eaQiEWLHQ3rFAXUr/dqH1pN hMN9C+UlUXD5W3e1l6JvFCOXkbvdGgDA96NYGITiLQe8+cV0y0oJxmmhpJ/ncltBReT/ y4G8HCEs3qjCXnUS1MnSX1TlwNYYMkeQJJXhkt4xdEfhe1KoMvzv+bCld9ZZUawV5jfg 8uSs/hwBNYhE3guxEF0zqShAfRDl9sXb5guhX4auq23sGIdFdTNY6IBPH3l2Q4EvX3yr 4Fvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOYskMK4Sq018x6n3U+aetc8+sr2cmnmAv+HZcMi5WlijPRn2yC6NOF2/0l2ExR9A== X-Received: by 10.194.107.69 with SMTP id ha5mr4415649wjb.100.1473447100784; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.26] (adby20.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [79.184.24.20]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n7sm4698853wjf.11.2016.09.09.11.51.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Announcing Git User's Survey 2016 [was: Working with public-inbox.org] To: Johannes Schindelin References: <20160819150340.725bejnps6474u2e@sigill.intra.peff.net> <5e480a5b-3752-55c0-65ed-52ca5802851f@gmail.com> Cc: Duy Nguyen , Jeff King , Stefan Beller , meta@public-inbox.org, "git@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Wong From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jakub_Nar=c4=99bski?= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 20:51:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: Hello Johannes, W dniu 09.09.2016 o 15:06, Johannes Schindelin napisał: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, Jakub Narębski wrote: >> W dniu 28.08.2016 o 10:38, Johannes Schindelin pisze: >> >>> I would like to strongly caution against putting too much stock into >>> this users' survey. It is the best we have, granted. Yet I have not >>> heard from anybody that they participated in the survey, unless they >>> were also subscribed to the Git mailing list. >> >> I tried in past and will try for this year Git User's Survey to be >> announced more widely than just Git mailing list (git@vger.kernel.org). > > I did not mean to criticise you. I think you are doing the best you can, > and it is valuable. [...] > > The question is not so much how to advertise the survey. I skip almost all > surveys I am asked to participate in, because I am just a little bit busy > all the time. I feel that my colleagues do the same. Unless forced to take > a survey, they skip it. Right, that's a problem. Thanks for reminding me. I hope that the fact that by default (via the use of cookies) you can return to Survs.com survey at later time (assuming that you do it from the same computer and the same web browser), and continue responding. Taking 30 minutes or more at once may be a problem, taking 10 x 3 minutes may not be. But I won't have too much hope... -- Jakub Narębski