user/dev discussion of public-inbox itself
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org>
To: "Duy Nguyen" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
	"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Stefan Beller" <sbeller@google.com>,
	meta@public-inbox.org, git@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric Wong" <e@80x24.org>, "Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:38:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B21604E7033C458EAC5EA0651CFEA8E9@PhilipOakley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CACsJy8BG63oaLbw0f7try3OpzdphLC7UGAaJ=vgikEB36Pagqg@mail.gmail.com

From: "Duy Nguyen" <pclouds@gmail.com>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>> My point stands. We are way more uninviting to contributors than
>> necessary. And a huge part of the problem is that we require contributors
>> to send their patches inlined into whitespace-preserving mails.
>
> We probably can settle this in the next git survey with a new
> question: what's stopping you from contributing to git?
> -- 
One has to be careful that some of this is preaching to the choir.

Those who have difficulty won't be anywhere near the survey. Those that are 
near the survey will have enough nouce to contribute to the level they 
manage.

Also the argument here has started to be at cross purposes about the issues 
vs the solutions.

I do note that dscho's patches now have the extra footer (below the three 
dashes) e.g.

Published-As: https://github.com/dscho/git/releases/tag/cat-file-filters-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/dscho/git cat-file-filters-v1

If say I used that, and sent my patch series via Outlook Express (<sigh>), 
with it's white space damage, would those footers help once the content has 
been reviewed (rather than white spacing style) in the applying the patch?

Even, Is there a way of accepting email that has HTML embedded by the 
client, rather than [vger, etc.] simply deleting the email as 'not 
acceptable'. Unless users can get past these sort of (to them) petty and 
awkward restrictions, it's going to continue to be difficult to encourage 
participation.

--

Philip

PS Sudden though about the 'Published-As: Fetch-It-Via: ' stuff. I don't 
think we have a method of 'Fetch-As-A-Series' so that what is received from 
the server (e.g. GitHub, as a git command equivalent) is just those 
patches/commits in the series, and the recipient can then see if they apply 
cleanly at the point they want to apply them? This would almost be a 'pack 
file' that is all commit deltas, that can be given to say 'rebase' (or 
'apply'). It could also be expanded back into an mbox format if required...




  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-22 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-16 16:55 Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path] Stefan Beller
2016-08-16 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-16 17:20   ` Jeff King
2016-08-16 17:54     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-16 17:22   ` Stefan Beller
2016-08-16 17:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-16 20:44   ` Eric Wong
2016-08-16 20:56     ` Eric Wong
2016-08-18 12:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-18 20:49   ` Eric Wong
2016-08-18 21:41     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-19 15:18       ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-19 15:30     ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-19 16:55       ` Stefan Beller
2016-08-19 22:35         ` Eric Wong
2016-08-22 13:38         ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-22 19:21         ` Jeff King
2016-08-19 22:35       ` Eric Wong
2016-08-22 13:18         ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-22 18:05           ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-25 13:21             ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-28 18:23               ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-29 10:46                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-22 22:55           ` Eric Wong
2016-08-25 12:58             ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-27 22:38               ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-28  8:36                 ` Working with public-inbox.org Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-28 11:41                   ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-29  5:35                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-19 15:03   ` Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path] Jeff King
2016-08-20 19:57     ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-23  4:47       ` Arif Khokar
2016-08-24 15:34         ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-24 18:49           ` Eric Wong
2016-08-24 19:12             ` Jeff King
2016-08-24 19:27               ` Eric Wong
2016-08-25  3:40             ` Arif Khokar
2016-08-25  2:41           ` Arif Khokar
2017-02-10 16:10           ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-02-13  5:52             ` Arif Khokar
2017-02-13 14:37               ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-02-14  3:56                 ` Arif Khokar
2017-02-14  3:59                   ` Arif Khokar
2017-02-14  7:13                   ` Eric Wong
2017-02-13 19:21               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-14  3:55                 ` Arif Khokar
2017-02-14  4:41                   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-14  5:09                     ` Arif Khokar
2017-02-14  5:14                     ` Jeff King
2016-08-22 13:06     ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-22 13:15       ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-22 20:38         ` Philip Oakley [this message]
2016-08-24 13:04           ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-24 19:16             ` Eric Wong
2016-08-25 13:08               ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-25  3:57             ` Arif Khokar
2016-08-25 13:01               ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-25 23:14                 ` Arif Khokar
2016-08-26  8:08                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-27 22:26         ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-28  8:38           ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-28 13:45             ` Announcing Git User's Survey 2016 [was: Working with public-inbox.org] Jakub Narębski
2016-09-09 13:06               ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-09 18:51                 ` Jakub Narębski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://public-inbox.org/README

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B21604E7033C458EAC5EA0651CFEA8E9@PhilipOakley \
    --to=philipoakley@iee.org \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/public-inbox.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).