From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS6315 166.70.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D645D1F4BD; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1iHoSi-0004WO-RL; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 06:19:32 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1iHoSb-0007J7-Uu; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 06:19:32 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Eric Wong Cc: Alyssa Ross , meta@public-inbox.org References: <87imp05hlm.fsf@alyssa.is> <20191008001050.rwd7bh7cek7qrydi@dcvr> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 07:18:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20191008001050.rwd7bh7cek7qrydi@dcvr> (Eric Wong's message of "Tue, 8 Oct 2019 00:10:50 +0000") Message-ID: <87wodfctwd.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1iHoSb-0007J7-Uu;;;mid=<87wodfctwd.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18GEY/fI8YIUHZa5rB/opuOYGNFmffXDIM= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: Do I need multiple publicinbox..address values? X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) List-Id: Eric Wong writes: > Alyssa Ross wrote: > >> Subject: Do I need multiple publicinbox..address values? > > Absolutely not > >> Suppose I have a mailing list, foo-discuss@example.org, and a >> public-inbox set up, subscribed to that mailing list, that is subscribed >> to that list as public-inbox+foo-discuss@example.org, where my MTA >> delivers to public-inbox using public-inbox-mda. > > Currently, -mda does if you're mirroring, unfortunately. I > think Eric Biederman is/was working on List-Id support to drop > that requirement, but I'm not sure where that is... > > Eric B: would you mind if I take List-Id support over? I've got > some hours free in the coming days(s)... (I think :x) I believe I have the config side of the work done. I haven't figured out how to add this to public-inbox-mda/public-inbox-watch. Let me send out what I have and then you can work on the bits for public-inbox-watch public-inbox-mda. Last round I was messing with this I almost had my imap fetcher in shape. I may try again but let's get the listid thing settled first if we can. Eric