From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS63949 176.58.96.0/19 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8DF71F454 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 00:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C621A213CB; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 00:33:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: interop with leafnode References: <87tvlkbkrk.fsf@taht.net> <20181027001054.dd7si5aukfwxuop4@dcvr> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:33:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20181027001054.dd7si5aukfwxuop4@dcvr> (Eric Wong's message of "Sat, 27 Oct 2018 00:10:54 +0000") Message-ID: <87efcc44a7.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Eric Wong writes: > Dave Taht wrote: >> I excitedly accessed it directly from gnus. Oh, joy, bliss, rapture! >> Blazing fast, useful at a glance. >> >> In a paroxysm of overenthusiasm for the the good ole days I then >> setup a >> leafnode real quick and pointed it at his instance so I could >> replicate... >> >> For most (not all) traffic, leafnode does this: >> >> > Oct 16 22:08:01 spaceheater fetchnews[3045]: lwn.kernel.lkml: >> > considering articles 200621 - 200643 >> > Oct 16 22:08:01 spaceheater fetchnews[3045]: Discarding article >> > 200621 >> > - no Path: found > > I guess there's some bug or missing commands in public-inbox-nntpd > which leafnode relies on. Sorry I haven't had time to investigate > or do much with public-inbox, lately (but maybe you could :) > >> :( >> >> I'm really glad to hear of this project. It sounds like more of the >> right way to do this is via a local git? > > Yes, git clone/fetch + running your own public-inbox-nntpd instance > and using slrn/gnus/mutt(w/ nntp patch)/sylpheed/thunderbird all > seem to work. I will try to modernize.