user/dev discussion of public-inbox itself
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Alyssa Ross <hi@alyssa.is>
To: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] #!/usr/bin/perl -> #!/usr/bin/env perl
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 17:47:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a7akcq8h.fsf@alyssa.is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190926024938.GA19132@dcvr>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1069 bytes --]

>>  certs/create-certs.perl       | 2 +-
>
> Documentation in corresponding t/*.t files could be better
> about running that and instead recommend "$^X"

Makes sense.  This was the one that was giving me problems in the first
place.

>>  t/hl_mod.t                    | 2 +-
>
> Oops, there probably shouldn't have a shebang there at all
> since none of the other *.t files have it.  I've also seen
> "#!perl -w" (no '/' at all) in other projects, but I don't think
> it's worth the effort unless some external tools/highlighters
> work better with it. I expect "#!/usr/bin/perl -w" to be most
> compatible with highlighters and stuff like file(1).

#!perl has some nice characteristics -- it's understood by the
interpreter for setting flags, and for -x, but at the same time it's
clear that a file with #!perl is not supposed to be directly executed.

Assuming you don't want to change to #!perl, do you want a patch to
recommend running certs/create-certs.perl and remove the shebang from
t/hl_mod.t?  And should the executable bits still be set on the other
files?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-01 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-24 20:43 [PATCH] #!/usr/bin/perl -> #!/usr/bin/env perl Alyssa Ross
2019-09-26  2:49 ` Eric Wong
2019-10-01 17:47   ` Alyssa Ross [this message]
2019-10-01 20:58     ` Eric Wong
2019-10-02 21:36       ` [PATCH] tests: recommend running create-certs.pl with $^X Alyssa Ross
2019-10-02 23:19         ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://public-inbox.org/README

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a7akcq8h.fsf@alyssa.is \
    --to=hi@alyssa.is \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/public-inbox.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).