user/dev discussion of public-inbox itself
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] start depending on Perl 5.10.1+
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 01:54:09 +0000
Message-ID: <20190429015409.vxgjuinoiltbgbdd@dcvr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

The one minor, (and likely irrelevant) downside to this change
would be any of code which relies on the 'fields' pragma for
pseudo-hash performance benefits is out-of-luck since
pseudo-hashes were removed in Perl 5.9.

Our only use of the 'fields' pragma is from Danga::Socket
(and descendent) classes.  Fwiw, I have never used Perl 5.8 on
public-inbox myself, either.

  reply index

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17 22:05 Eric Wong
2019-04-29  1:54 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2019-06-02 20:13   ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190429015409.vxgjuinoiltbgbdd@dcvr \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

user/dev discussion of public-inbox itself

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/meta
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/meta
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/meta

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:

 note: .onion URLs require Tor:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox