From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A8EE20248 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id d14so12397377ljl.9 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:28:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loskot-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=dQkUBqpgihBXEv0Uu30ETfkR1wfnSiThL+8SBolqaOE=; b=0wx6PaVkf8uMCUMyCAK/G3myjQab7Rgb/boDoT5T0JrgJ7dJKRlHrYY8MF9R2r941n Hz/vnaiL7jyEZLTfwh40KBI9Nv3l6H+DzwFH1N9a6T0k8dtrl7YI2tjMXSEaS4Ri5Edh Fa/Rs8xMKj01vWF+cthO3a8QUX0Jh1zrsuHdxg1Cl7NQHvX1Ny0l1UoYbVKyrsSZ8/id 8by7oud14nkU0wYN2eb7Q8XYIkiT06vb1IHj20fCykM8jsX2wyMetj7uRv6RCgrJ1drR DmqWEM1ueVey/JVmuQWG7oTl8vAIfoGPwhQozGemYZktjRrBdsOnFPRKB9S9d977f8sX hgYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=dQkUBqpgihBXEv0Uu30ETfkR1wfnSiThL+8SBolqaOE=; b=jnC3FAkdbo7sSmfnAHG3ErFUuYdEBKvuH+AuA1XSxD7vm94HNGb8dVjH6Q01AVmTpW JMJm4BCXEmkBSzJ3cQatQ/aA3M0UhlfqLFH55wHBPxQlh1rVvm6QpMEwwf3OnJStbNyh +mfpXA3nwMC5SS/rd2R6nKehVQJyqm/ZmwaoGSrxF8R3dtl7G1sZcg3J9dhV983xAPav nVI1lnGNLAQX23ENDnVPDLoBlqDJb4P6EOzoRNsoX3PQeVn1hRM/4zlwZzbdg1PcYlAI hCLwjGlA4yT+WcIwnazgOJhqsmJZ5UpXdTXEzViC5ntWAprkoft8ba8wV/TmfS7BLoxE tMCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZZYuEwE9eAV1Z+4xDiAVmqDL1SI7DoXkm3fHo7niRIWxzxkVzV oMxU2HeLPt5OiQHO0CtXBliBP38J7UZghLO2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbGaeWmNMzuTPlFpRehBaNO2fImBnIoJvlOXfhL9Uf4z4VeXCuGhKaQHBoTJ/YT49QyUBSPUA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5d88:: with SMTP id v8mr14989667lje.150.1551227283070; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:28:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from DEV604.cadcorp.net (ftth-nat-108.ip4.greenlan.pl. [185.56.210.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u201sm1316232lff.65.2019.02.26.16.28.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:28:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 01:28:01 +0100 From: Mateusz =?utf-8?Q?=C5=81oskot?= To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Mirroring mailing lists directly Message-ID: <20190227002801.phharoyu66qkg5y7@DEV604.cadcorp.net> References: <20190223031048.GA7084@dcvr> <20190223220738.s5cij5pkqx7ke7ij@dcvr> <20190226175440.zni6w3fcmgz46gbm@DEV604.cadcorp.net> <20190226231907.l7y5arqx6pp2nidt@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190226231907.l7y5arqx6pp2nidt@dcvr> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 List-Id: O 19-02-26, Eric Wong wrote: >Mateusz Łoskot wrote: >> Meanwhile, if it's nota secret could you tell a bit about >> hosting of the public-inbox.org? >> >> Is this a VPS or a VM solution, a docker container? >> If a container, could you tell where do you host it? >> I'm still looking for options. > >I've been using a $20/month VPS since 2008 (USD). Nowadays it's >up to 2 cores, 4GB RAM which is more than I need but I keep >getting upgrades without paying more. Multiple cores definitely >helps, though; especially with SpamAssassin and incoming mail. For a mailing list mirror, is SpamAssassing necessary? My understanding is taht a mirror just pulls posts that have already reached the mailing list. >I don't give commercial endorsements (...( I perfectly understand that. >If you're mirroring lists I host, I prefer you host it elsewhere >to avoid putting too much dependency on a single provider or datacenter. I will keep that in mind. First, I'm going to mirror a different list. I will let you know when I succeed :) >Process setup is: > >public-inbox-httpd -> varnish -> yet-another-horribly-named-server (HTTP/HTTPS) > \ > >- tor (.onion) >public-inbox-nntpd ----------/ > \ > `--------(NNTP port 119) > >yet-another-horribly-named-server is an experimental GPL-3 Ruby >server which does HTTPS termination and hosts some other Ruby >stuff on the same IP (different vhost). nginx is a more common >replacement and recommended for most sites :) > >public-inbox-nntpd should learn TLS anyways, so doing HTTPS from >public-inbox-httpd won't be far off, either. Making varnish >unnecessary is another goal, but could be tougher... I will try simplest setup possible. Once again, thank you! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net