From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4731F6C1; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:26:14 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Stefan Beller Cc: meta@public-inbox.org, Heiko Voigt Subject: Re: messages dropped in the public inbox ? Message-ID: <20160824182613.GA8578@whir> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Stefan Beller wrote: > Please see https://public-inbox.org/git/20160817204848.8983-1-sbeller@google.com/ > and its answers: > > Thread overview: 4+ messages in thread (expand / mbox.gz / Atom feed / [top]) > 2016-08-17 20:48 Stefan Beller [this message] > 2016-08-17 21:05 ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-08-17 21:14 ` Stefan Beller > [not found] ` <20160818140922.GA5925@sandbox> > 2016-08-24 16:46 ` Stefan Beller > > The message id 20160818140922.GA5925@sandbox > is not found? > > When I query the git repository for that message > (via a generic `git log --author=Heiko --oneline`) I cannot spot > the message. > > Was it just dropped spuriously? +Cc: Heiko I guess it was dropped by vger, first. If you check https://public-inbox.org/git/20160818140922.GA5925@sandbox/ and follow the links to marc.info or mail-archive.com, it's missing in those places, too. Same with nntp://news.gmane.org/20160818140922.GA5925@sandbox (should load in w3m or lynx) It might've also coincided with vger downtime, so perhaps Heiko's server failed to retry. vger has had quite a few failures, recently (or perhaps I'm only paying attention more now that I'm mirroring git@vger). Based on his other messages and the Message-ID, it looks like he used mutt; so it's unlikely to be a problem with HTML (but perhaps it was some taboo attachment, but also unlikely). Anything interesting from looking at the raw message +headers? Thanks. In general, these things happen (and happened in the heyday of Usenet, too); and quoting is helpful for this.