From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 74.125.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com (mail-wm0-f66.google.com [74.125.82.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A06A1F859 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id q128so14603860wma.1 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:06:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YJHy3pzc2VK3AW1adOmqNNFuy4tcyo9GIyRqNgdLgWU=; b=fSkDsHNsF5LLv5IvDvklL0u6iO7x50xMex/J5aRU9bhvbEJ7GVff73C9ahn/qI+QXX PUPK1KdL/B7hg+77a34lCiClezgXUoFQeBaCVzUG4F5moBxvHDTjzn4cD742xZL8/Slo SFbO5/BiS2mV0stt0stHyP729syh3iuDSJ/ptvEbfc1+ttdUGxxP2MhM542oxtsh5GBE XbMRQeseQD/M1uASFs1H8XBRwMGpIVMdcRxR5uN4rsIOEcEBVTDxKfkZMR0XGW0Nb3Rl vnLf77ojtUZqdEszdNA/OFAYH2ij5CByHAXOsnQmYvGf/B00C5IjXYNxlBjfxiMD7adE k0Lg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YJHy3pzc2VK3AW1adOmqNNFuy4tcyo9GIyRqNgdLgWU=; b=TZ9bhOEomwdtXbKmrPvi+v5UwaIBxrd62w/TJYfOk4eIEiJ+sW0DrfQhcQ9+tOUduz zsfR0RqMIulDUoaLDIHVbXFfpS0Rnp7h6xvPXh0U8w2AEroqtxUtuZ5IpkKbkG0fJbMh 50TQn7+1md3bLchmoimGbZGjqBO5nfbBYmaYLx4E/D8S2RCs+dQLcO2DyEuGG77CpmfA Ry9jJDcnXxcvB133KYXO+tXcTpc7033LoreKWyUiLrlxyVKEz5JPa2yTO98uCYwK44Fj 8M81xBxtHgtEQeWDmc9l80+TdNCZmo0c1XXpGOWlU/cUEqpjwSRoSrtwi74ZrxYcZ1NQ q6oA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouulI31QvO/IpNWxU9LD7LnGK+Gvdydy9RSlBkzU9KqnuL5kCB9peUBnGM8UzjCU4Q== X-Received: by 10.194.235.166 with SMTP id un6mr18131928wjc.169.1471889159846; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.26] (abri28.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.8.102.28]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 190sm22791168wmk.13.2016.08.22.11.05.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path] To: Johannes Schindelin , Eric Wong References: <20160818204902.GA1670@starla> <20160819223547.GB16646@dcvr> Cc: Stefan Beller , meta@public-inbox.org, git@vger.kernel.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jakub_Nar=c4=99bski?= Message-ID: <02c1c636-b0b4-8730-68a6-18f017ed3410@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:05:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: W dniu 22.08.2016 o 15:18, Johannes Schindelin pisze: > So unfortunately this thread has devolved. Which is sad. Because all I > wanted is to have a change in Git's submission process that would not > exclude *so many* developers. That is really all I care about. Not about > tools. Not about open vs proprietary, or standards. > > I just want developers who are already familiar with Git, and come up with > an improvement to Git itself, to be able to contribute it without having > to pull out their hair in despair. What is lacking in using submitGit tool for those that have problems with sending patches via email? Submitting changes in Git comes in three phases: - submit email with patches - review and discuss patch - apply patches from email Pull request via GitHub / Bitbucket / GitLab is easier than sending patches via email (pity that GitHub et al. do not have such submitGit-like automation built-in). But I think email, with threaded view, careful trimming of quoted contents, multi-level quotes is superior to exiting web-based solutions. Regards, -- Jakub Narębski