From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9721F55B for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 19:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725961AbgFCTez (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:34:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52884 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725821AbgFCTey (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:34:54 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869A15C7F2; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=zNRyXX+udrDmQPpFPXecFRDhR58=; b=f6OAEi SqZdhrmYs0lNkBYFHdK1It/QP67s1Vf8YtFWFR9WVx6UpXD62FtO6p7TWxMKb+cp TA977puA3sSgkYAsVJdOwBDPiBddF275SRRNqJNhp6iX7E1e56W+LR6e0k6Yc/Dj lwigqEqqIxmo0kcfMGD3wpaKIvZMf4Y5at5co= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LZVJz/My/PGOXzbyvcVbkSsM1XMmvz1K rlhHg5P90mTmVn0CkhqUbnjZGCWLf66p2ITXNqOX2o3j0cJ5B5K4ja8BPyWHK89Q yAwhzy8i1XJ4kBd/dld3Lcb/Uqh+ZZFIa+nZMFuKhK5LNWLwYb4HDURPoQXldJpr nvXgp7nSGLk= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8FB5C7F0; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06E0E5C7EE; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git-for-windows@googlegroups.com, git@vger.kernel.org, git-packagers@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: symbolic links in Git for Windows v2.27.0, was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git for Windows 2.27.0-rc2 References: <20200526204539.6181-1-johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 12:34:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:54:03 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4B6D652E-A5D1-11EA-A426-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: >> I'll remind myself that I'll try to tag and push out the final >> before 1700 UTC, which would be around 10AM for me ;-) > > That will work. That's 7pm for me, which is still safely after-hours, but > it's better than 2am. That time is 2AM for me depending on the season, though I am straying off of my migratory patterns this year. > On the other hand, I do not even think that Git for Windows versions > _need_ to be released on the same calendar day as Git versions. True. The "same calendar day" is a fuzzy notion anyway, and the other major platform seems to lag by a lot more if I am not mistaken. I was just trying to make the schedule predictable, so that you and others do not have to say "if the tag was pushed early enough in the day for me". I'd actually prefer to tag a bit later in the day myself, so we can pick any time, or pick no time at all and have you and distro folks subscribed to push notification RSS, perhaps.