From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6932202A0 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752984AbdKBBYn (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:24:43 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:65455 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752416AbdKBBYm (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:24:42 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45635AA7C5; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:24:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=so8kn8ME6/d5 fuh6sHZl1gynndg=; b=WKglG/hbryurmn7bk2zexRwPU8Uc7DwW+k52s39v6qgR QKQ8rFYARLsE14N9N+ZSvVKNajUqzoJP3K+CweJYtnyCTqLU8BHjeX1XU5daZs0/ Qgm8RIkh/rr+qEOTV8NJuSzwmZS4KkvvU2t3kGabk7OwxzXki7i0kTLS/rOyzpU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=h3WTlr GjOLyCqrVgv1hKTIV856xi+l04D/0v4i7TxJnv3JgWBL9vHwxHBqIHvb6oCnKn78 EQkWKvLXzfL63RSzWzW5jz8UHNlLaEUf2eYG3iSmk/M4jvOKgO8sopA6j2TAwVkv a+7hJ1TpC0IFU9jRyPtXbsVK25YtrGBtlqXuU= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD5DAA7C4; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:24:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2744AA7C3; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:24:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Antoine =?utf-8?Q?Beaupr=C3=A9?= Cc: Eric Sunshine , Git List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] remote-mediawiki: skip virtual namespaces References: <20171029160857.29460-2-anarcat@debian.org> <20171030025142.19421-1-anarcat@debian.org> <20171030025142.19421-5-anarcat@debian.org> <87wp3a54nj.fsf@curie.anarc.at> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 10:24:40 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87wp3a54nj.fsf@curie.anarc.at> ("Antoine =?utf-8?Q?Beaupr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Wed, 01 Nov 2017 12:45:36 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 99DBFFF2-BF6C-11E7-A39B-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 writes: > It might still worth fixing this, but I'm not sure what the process is > here - in the latest "what's cooking" Junio said this patchset would be > merged in "next". Should I reroll the patchset to fix this or not? The process is for you (the contributor of the topic) to yell at me, "don't merge it yet, there still are updates to come". That message _may_ come to late, in which case we may have to go incremental, but I usually try to leave at least a few days between the time I mark a topic as "will merge" and the time I actually do the merge, for this exact reason. Thanks.