From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B7120281 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 02:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753408AbdJaCkJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:40:09 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:52821 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751974AbdJaCkH (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:40:07 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83B8A7163; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:40:06 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=itUnPhA/KJIhSvXSdnJuBYtW/xU=; b=DvRIKL LUlskiURqn4UL91yNbZw9AbHE/1+k+tDIbp7tG1SEhmgP3hp/lzT4K+tTGsYOrB+ S4taaP6qFoGBgVrrer0p1Uk0KZ+bxlB23qXOOoYqjFnQAzOfm0WXZWYKlZsdarDd j1G8SsefSEKwNgZHS5xJm6fiDYgVaJITMTfT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZxXRuKBHZB9US0EuxzGsfYmzJRDKM1P6 B67J4rE3aXppvxN+LHPDnnzfgc9DFnmq/j9ToOdnU+FYgm4tMH+xcdV18W2yJsfw rAHFSzC7Vfr9H55W+kBLAatQ8SJm45UP2o5GR/xAjvxJrDlYo+wbXxWc2vZUSst4 3mlDZqlwW1A= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D77A7162; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F9BEA7161; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:40:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff Hostetler Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Jeff Hostetler , Jonathan Tan , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2017, #07; Mon, 30) References: Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:40:05 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Jeff Hostetler's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:54:14 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CDE7648C-BDE4-11E7-848B-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff Hostetler writes: > I've been assuming that the jt/partial-clone-lazy-fetch is a > placeholder for our next combined patch series. Yes, that, together with the expectation that I will hear from both you and JTan once the result of combined effort becomes ready to replace this placeholder, matches my assumption. Is that happening now?