From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AE8201A7 for ; Sat, 20 May 2017 23:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755126AbdETXua (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2017 19:50:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:34510 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753121AbdETXu3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2017 19:50:29 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f196.google.com with SMTP id w69so13338860pfk.1 for ; Sat, 20 May 2017 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKXm0Cue55sCEObMgSVNGrS8VukoK1sO7STy3dzlkBg=; b=r3Fpu+dYF8k86F/7ddpXPPsiWbNjPYjNsr3P/mDteAmQ6iBjD8oXHhi9u6YjFrJTmf mJ/jWdybzuOI8rDc27sLmF6gp7Y9moVJ3U95FcWpLHhD0vCmIHUUV507dZTZDENmYsfh PdvIx6zPzVDeBpcM226OuCSpohP2psSC0TUOOoWdYfkOaLBqvk0gCqVRylTTGMT72eLG BRzKraqWWufOoF1ULBT7od/OejxPUa7rcynvvGTfeAx+n2m+cnUZR5J0hE0LJO22K71y uc2pUD5Uysw1lhz27gTOtBXjfKWxRh579XGPaA+O/j+QUo5afGEGPgtB+HKE/96C7WoJ TBKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKXm0Cue55sCEObMgSVNGrS8VukoK1sO7STy3dzlkBg=; b=H2WzIt2kNjqmD9J4xBagc7pjarOH3giZdvH/pFUmA+Dp7fkXZA3V8p0Gu/WKmX6YPj ik80fa5UlG1pxrtQ3wYMzKaQwruCPAyDFOaILNu2Pu3/a9DCFxJzk+XLsqT3/AwZ1F/s SW6AgZar4UZWPp0VeZ6THmnNiA71yRJicKrcmxqZES1i9pL48xGfqJbA+gUJTUyzXvvI fTgY5RdzQrMLFLKwS4+wK95nQ9ExiuTRyokM6AS8ayTJ0H5QO3CA6MXf5HO2zB4s+2jw 8hX9Ayky/86pfyjC1RyE1ZVvY5OdIOTC4lSZXVcPFzxxHcU8rZcWDjuj+XsjI5wWvtkY 2zNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAiuVGQCz/KjwyRFeRtgm7guJNDpXq7GL3djFZq6Mlt3zQWfubi 8uzKpJ4tGpw+hw== X-Received: by 10.84.194.165 with SMTP id h34mr19513686pld.65.1495324229272; Sat, 20 May 2017 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:8622:a59e:fcd8:9df2:4b0f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t3sm22769056pfl.60.2017.05.20.16.50.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 May 2017 16:50:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Jeffrey Walton , =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Kiedrowicz , J Smith , Victor Leschuk , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Fredrik Kuivinen , Brandon Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/30] Easy to review grep & pre-PCRE changes References: <20170520214233.7183-1-avarab@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 08:50:27 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > Easy to review? 29 (I mean 30) patches? Are you kidding me?! > > As noted in v1 (<20170511091829.5634-1-avarab@gmail.com>; > https://public-inbox.org/git/20170511091829.5634-1-avarab@gmail.com/) > these are all doc, test, refactoring etc. changes needed by the > subsequent "PCRE v2, PCRE v1 JIT, log -P & fixes" series. > > Since Junio hasn't been picking it I'm no longer sending updates to > that patch series & waiting for this one to cook first. I actually do not mind a reroll that goes together with this. The only reason why I skipped the earlier one was because I looked at the original one, and the discussion on the reroll of this 'easy to review' part indicated that it will be rerolled, before I got to look at these upper layer patches. Overall nicely done. I only had just a few observations. Thanks.