From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B9D1F461 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389425AbfHVUSM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:18:12 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56862 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730203AbfHVUSM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:18:12 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABD5166F00; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:18:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=RLtNU1c5mXq58W8os7fwqgGDW5Q=; b=sJm/tC2r/Gmt8IEZ6y2i XZ6RHtDQBCWzNhhimQIcCzt6yKH1nw3X1IiYrAFnBxmdHeG4asCulFOaxu+3qKI7 atg2j+TxUKj3HQzLljZBXw3ikPZ8QtlW7HStwPexfdU/Z5eV36nsRLaO1Sv0yHQG K2+DVJdRiRESyke08SFkERo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=f8bQxyiLo1nwD38auGBPaSRK1PaB9f2jei3MVeIvWKsCqC WEKaeboLO5YC+Z1U8xGpeldYzOF8bs38EH2tVk/0kzQgZOsQ5d/KsvcACxNoRs6p wCCy15aCbl+qXs+t5Vvbi1XnGXTh2SLkB64iaj4iO+pVAOd2FXJq43kgNqlT0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307B6166EFF; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91E72166EFE; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:18:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: Git Mailing List , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmo=?= =?utf-8?B?w7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] format-patch: learn --infer-cover-subject option (also t4014 cleanup) References: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:18:08 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F58F1F1E-C519-11E9-B9DD-46F8B7964D18-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Denton Liu writes: > While we're at it, perform some major cleanup of t4014 including some > stylistic cleanup and also, unmasking of Git return codes. Wow. It seems that "while we're at it" grew quite large and (from purely patch count's point of view) ends up appearing as if it were the primary focus of the series ;-) Thanks for tackling the age-old mess. Admittedly, this particular script is from the older parts of Git's history and a clean-up was long overdue. With the "split pipes" approach taken in patches 09 and 10, we'd end up leaving more untracked and unignored cruft in the working tree. I do not think they would cause problems with the existing tests after reading the patches over.