From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11329207EC for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 17:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933349AbcI3R4L (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:11 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63099 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932430AbcI3R4K (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:10 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DC93F94B; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:08 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4Uz6c54HdzWVh0dksSa7zrR9HBA=; b=hIACyF VJttZG4adhwS30IPfjXtekMxYN0RJuad3CkML6QmFvCkVWv8DPFBt/xOiQh22XJF SiK9I0LPoiIFZTNcIk1qXusyfiGaICpjWpoblFkzM9XcWrnuBIB0nDJoKQpw2dmn /y/VDQZi98Budol3GYQ2jOym/RMqwUrWmsV18= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=NQIabul+fFC2935vKWYJ1MgWJK6JSOs8 nwg9H/ZFwea5Q7WsY+8vjdVtS1ClO3WkfIJgfogVR9HpFYItFkcAQKe7dxu+a2AW vzCE/XCw5WfKLl2mwgsP6gZCJeINSzVRm/a+HUXUhplAAiis73DPqxn2WF9T0HXk JshmOOQffaw= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C936B3F94A; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49F253F949; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Linus Torvalds , Johannes Sixt , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] core.abbrev: raise the default abbreviation to 12 hexdigits References: <20160929191609.maxggcli76472t4g@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160930080658.lyi7aovvazjmy346@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:56:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160930080658.lyi7aovvazjmy346@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:06:58 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2A40551C-8737-11E6-A7D2-EAAE7A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I agree that this deals with the performance concerns by caching the > default_abbrev_len and starting there. I still think it's unnecessarily > invasive to touch get_short_sha1() at all, which is otherwise only a > reading function. > > So IMHO, the best combination is the init_default_abbrev() you posted in > [1], but initialized at the top of find_unique_abbrev(). And cached > there, obviously, in a similar way. Hmm. I am undecided; both approaches look OK to me.