From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9275720986 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753243AbcJDS4T (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:56:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55470 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752027AbcJDS4S (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:56:18 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B3142449; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:56:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=i25eQNohqFPfyWDzTQZzFtsuOlU=; b=LASMdt MDqlTxDu7w5gtHHA35f58l9lrKe0IwgRSNOhTMpz8DaHqxjBRaZkCoe0nbmXJQJO TQ1JLG3lu+8qLihmUiHcuq1AoQ7MP6um7tCj8LxQ5P4H0lj6l2GMf9xOkE8zT0SF r4idDCb1kj3xkGr5d0C4OFQbIMTJs5eEYhGVU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UmTloVYkTg9zelGzDjpnlces08ZUrM5/ gs+Okt6HSDJniIr85KsEDtpdDrQjlZqJeceGGYrLOkGv5aS6C3sMyOf4/XwrZwDn EWfJ5H6hOQbuEh9GsbDy0c9ilkJFinEJ4+gotC/cfchdLlQ1f4ZxJs9SKX4Zqd0w Ka3mRWg6sig= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85AB42448; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:56:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23ADE42447; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:56:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Pull out require_clean_work_tree() functionality from builtin/pull.c References: Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:56:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:04:44 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3AF08A32-8A64-11E6-AC77-50B112518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > This is the 5th last patch series of my work to accelerate interactive > rebases in particular on Windows. Offtopic, but I am always confused by what you might mean by this "nth last patch series". Is this series 5th from the last and we have four more to go? In any case, after a quick re-read and comparison with the last round, I think this is in a good shape. I'd say that we would wait for a few days for others to comment and then merge it to 'next' if we missed nothing glaringly wrong. Thanks.