git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] t3420: remove progress lines before comparing output
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 10:23:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmuhw4afu.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a0a968e-6929-71eb-77cf-ec3ee28fd734@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:54:08 +0100")

Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:

>> As long as sed implementation used here does not do anything funny
>> to CR, I think the approach to strip everything before the last CR
>> on the line is sensible.  As I am not familiar with how Windows port
>> of sed wants to treat a CR byte in the pattern, I am not sure about
>> the precondition of the above statement, though.
>
> I wondered about that too, but it passes the CI tests under windows.

Hopefully Git for Windows, MinGW, and CygWin would all behave
similarly.

>> I also have to wonder if we can/want to do this without an extra
>> printf process every time we sanitize the output, though I do not
>> think I care too deeply about it.
>
> I could add 're="$(printf ...)"' to the setup at the top of the file
> if you want

As I do not care too deeply about it, we recently saw a lot about
reducing number of processes in the tests, so apparently some folks
care and I presume they want to see something like that to happen.
I do not think $re is a good name for such a variable, though ;-)

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-02 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-01 13:11 [PATCH 0/1] t3420 remove progress from output Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2019-07-01 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/1] t3420: remove progress lines before comparing output Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2019-07-01 21:01   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-02 15:54     ` Phillip Wood
2019-07-02 17:23       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-07-04  9:53         ` Phillip Wood
2019-07-04  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] t3420 remove progress from output Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2019-07-04  9:47   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] t3420: remove progress lines before comparing output Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqmuhw4afu.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).