From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] verify-tag: add --check-name flag Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:21:48 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160607195608.16643-1-santiago@nyu.edu> <20160607211707.GA7981@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160607215536.GA20768@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160607220743.GA21043@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160607221325.GA21166@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: santiago@nyu.edu, Git Mailing List , Eric Sunshine , Colin Walters To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 08 00:23:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bAPNq-00008X-FG for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:22:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932835AbcFGWVx (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:21:53 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56667 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753554AbcFGWVw (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:21:52 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE41323CA0; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:21:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qsPIQkK8ePVOk9IXR+Q/vPX+waU=; b=eANspm gW0AEGaonSyK1qn8pbAdbpeNXW/yAGBztZ2TEdH8Iu/wyhrzycofuDx3/V51PZEy 8Mz/cRm9balNxVqnSIJYyM7TYzkn6C/vg8dXOJnYzvzSHWxHUnfLWApxj+aHkXmP 8qeA7xVWiItM7aDCch1w07EpuNZsAxWfb3zLo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Esnl92aDeNUTCZ6SVXuooWmztqxdCiG0 6ah72iTPR2aGNE4f0JWn0SDJaYEPSQpR4Oxw5IIrd1QrwZMjaj4Whles5GUK+F16 GtnbPhARPGPan1K69vv3D/zhDe+pdADlmhl1zPDa47ACd/l3MD7CxSdJwCvtUbz0 LtuBhz+BC3A= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EA323C9F; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F8B823C9E; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:21:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20160607221325.GA21166@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:13:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3AD9FA60-2CFE-11E6-9FA9-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > If you are suggesting that you can do the whole thing today by parsing > the tag object yourself, then sure, I agree. I thought the point of the > exercise was to make that less painful for the callers. Yes, and I somehow thought everybody agreed that --show-tag-name was striking the balance at about the right level for ease-of-use and simplicity?