From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D8D20281 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 00:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751002AbdKFAiN (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:38:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:57119 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750819AbdKFAiM (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:38:12 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534E4B3073; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:38:11 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=P0jzIilzNUeG yhk1ZMKa8bgwVkw=; b=LHZhV1YFuk2Cnwpakh7+B9Q1YUM/WgY1/3mJE5KOLHY1 G/pBsr8KvjIo1F3HqDeZsqyLHm1Z1uT5NZqhM/HGNov4JqplDCO/kEQM1ZMq4uqw Rm0v8LYEoChsbP1/EgpJIdlZdmv6nGcy9zhvtEcByoDy0W/fhe/fmubXPlhF96w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZlF9ws PvIPWGNgxaSa2BRVvfZh6i/J8Pj8S5eUYYfYkV/uektbTnVuUZDfg/Z1dvq9LXw1 Lljv/mVtNWD4QzZ/ut85GbyPn0r1t2CyOrDVE6k7xLg4GqD4aJvz4ADUZuaxfipq gP1ZrQVbV3jPn05trAPk00dFWVm8zgzZ1fwRk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49869B3072; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDD5EB3071; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:38:10 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Antoine =?utf-8?Q?Beaupr=C3=A9?= Cc: Eric Sunshine , Git List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] remote-mediawiki: skip virtual namespaces References: <20171029160857.29460-2-anarcat@debian.org> <20171030025142.19421-1-anarcat@debian.org> <20171030025142.19421-5-anarcat@debian.org> <87wp3a54nj.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <87375w5qdw.fsf@curie.anarc.at> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:38:09 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87375w5qdw.fsf@curie.anarc.at> ("Antoine =?utf-8?Q?Beaupr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:20:43 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C40378AC-C28A-11E7-8010-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 writes: > On 2017-11-02 10:24:40, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 writes: >> >>> It might still worth fixing this, but I'm not sure what the process i= s >>> here - in the latest "what's cooking" Junio said this patchset would = be >>> merged in "next". Should I reroll the patchset to fix this or not? >> >> The process is for you (the contributor of the topic) to yell at me, >> "don't merge it yet, there still are updates to come". > > YELL! "don't merge it yet, there still are updates to come". :) Thanks; heard you loud and clear. >> That message _may_ come to late, in which case we may have to go >> incremental, but I usually try to leave at least a few days between >> the time I mark a topic as "will merge" and the time I actually do >> the merge, for this exact reason. > > Awesome, thanks for the update. > > i'll roll a v4 with the last tweaks, hopefully that will be the last. Thanks.