From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6951F461 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728204AbfGSPMT (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:12:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60229 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727649AbfGSPMT (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:12:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2647E15FC54; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:12:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iUauJJ4IL5fh3h30EVnSpbhZSyg=; b=DlxiW3 jkYbtesJt8BA+Pmmtn/v5pPq6mrXLnvp/SSmfyPtxyi8WSkIC9FxcafCgkCEOIvp eAaD5SQo+W+lNKa9I+9cy26nigKtbr80Mw1YaafvlBo95CRxHKyAFfhYsksIQFhZ V0U3pVJgHdz5j7J+JTqvmdyQPfTiYAwQBOh2Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rRailTw6Mpg/R5VVd2zx6whaCvh1Cxt6 kxlGfOckMHx6d1s3BRhlTvsjg37kozHC7Zx/OKNyL7BkgaWNAG0vHpNO/OC79+X2 VJ1OOa0evFrnA9atYHr9ZyTjHEULYiXBHDLlLctuSEt6FfAtMf/SuycnONF4gWFJ Hu1XWGc2s4g= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B78D15FC53; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:12:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75F8415FC52; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:12:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, e@80x24.org, chriscool@tuxfamily.org, jonathantanmy@google.com, tboegi@web.de, bwilliams.eng@gmail.com, jeffhost@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch: add "--parallel", which fetches all remotes in parallel References: <20190717015903.4384-1-palmer@sifive.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:12:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:23:29 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 98348784-AA37-11E9-AD28-46F8B7964D18-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > I have to admit that I'd _much_ rather see the strategy of > `fetch_populated_submodules()` emulated, where it uses the > `run_processes_parallel_tr2()` function to perform the actual fetches. Good. Thanks for chiming in.