From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216D21FC96 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755323AbcK2VvZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:51:25 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52408 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751591AbcK2Vuy (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:50:54 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7125234B; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:50:53 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ODq5R/9BVxwvIUi0noFAvTqvuYw=; b=iuBZf3 F7j/7xJ7J37eYAx62nNfGLNfSA6t3zsbHRt9dsEGbSekDuBz9xkJYsWh00UMRTYa upm6QX9kXb4q4GCiXA/RTKzXsdsugWrLD4zxMBYBW4B4RvZDQhg67WKuJ4cExL9Z LwMgQEYpgScczeRMHeHjKRfBvsqA3HrQWHDwY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=TQnpcs0c/sgDXsoEGySxOPhbL5oi5upb 7I/x/sqmkR4yJqOnPhVAdZsG/PWqgZUkt9zNGHiTdPp8my0Ty7kgZTg7RcCdjpS/ wsEdtGT4/ZoXDqM+hapa9Vi4pxY9iOSLqLSyL0yvCqRVryvJ1vqubrRKTJ9AVRyg jkSX7uX5B10= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72E65234A; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:50:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6353A52348; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:50:53 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Eli Barzilay , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gitconfig includes References: <20161129214604.c5xcw3d2a5ydpx42@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:50:51 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20161129214604.c5xcw3d2a5ydpx42@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:46:04 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E669EFBC-B67D-11E6-8EF5-B2917B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I think it's arguable whether "--global" should behave the same. I know you know this and I am writing this message for others. I admit that I wondered if "a single file" ought to cover these short-hand notations like --global and --local while re-reading the log message of 9b25a0b52 (config: add include directive, 2012-02-06). In other words, I agree that it used to be arguable before we released v1.7.10. It no longer is arguable simply due to backward compatibilty. The ship has long sailed.