From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85851FC44 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752179AbdBMTVt (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:21:49 -0500 Received: from mail-ot0-f195.google.com ([74.125.82.195]:35660 "EHLO mail-ot0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752009AbdBMTVs (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:21:48 -0500 Received: by mail-ot0-f195.google.com with SMTP id 65so13110345otq.2 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:21:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=ZjhjFe98PQCO+d2vSuIpJmps2J8/cyOURRR1k3SCSSg=; b=vcIfpbhxcDQ6RZWlfyHiH8BVGmSrcEzgnEP8YGcpDyW7G83B4tH5IF0nAjWmAak+UQ C5ckLVaNRz6E2BI4rJRS88/x3BQdin0athmv1OTV1NPluIo7wTcYx1rWtmdk4egXkMY7 aIOFdKBOz2yluFNOU/fzxn7JrNDTYXvFVWxHLFipN0JIgDV0DpNvGdzJtMszMIwetBfA xOxoVgCplX1GPrNK81r06F2zn6pKmNUvbDSzS2MrMVyxhwnSGzmlCZ5FaP0kJhLmy8OX 88y3PJkQNxNbln9KoDVHG/+1S0CRBIyRBvHhrQmzFGNGAM89jQwzyM4dh7/FTKKjLeBO upjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=ZjhjFe98PQCO+d2vSuIpJmps2J8/cyOURRR1k3SCSSg=; b=Ab0wZoNIHqSYM6oKs+nFRqkAIL2aJgJ2BwCER+UJLg3DyESB+xNJZkZxXiwfNIRoPm bmj+IGMMmC/otYpW+qKBkyxcON7Tsq0W1pCwZuQmWpDdzPex/Q5lywFWBuQJOd7Orjha IhsR3PPVQG/eoDOER75xABzjyc8hH6JC3ee3XyA6RTdlgiBhKnJCFthMjvc/YtYWyFFg AFBixOP8mDtkV7+epLnlHU9N4UR0DrYygjuyl3/WftUVPfijlwe4u6nJdRpQ2xYQ5Z+T ZUgP8T22a7AsxOxCiclMY6hordTuJyASPfPksjW5KkGvr+LRjpN3ps7nNAzagQaN3jk2 u/aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nESY/t4++fZQi59E2I8zTeYXH6Yd785Xfn4d7mcYpu1y1DJIZMQlnY1zhrljg9tw== X-Received: by 10.99.65.67 with SMTP id o64mr28349763pga.119.1487013708077; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:21:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:8622:d0e0:42a7:601f:5154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u28sm22559673pgo.20.2017.02.13.11.21.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:21:47 -0800 (PST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Arif Khokar Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Arif Khokar , Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= , Jeff King , Stefan Beller , "meta\@public-inbox.org" , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Wong Subject: Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path] References: <20160819150340.725bejnps6474u2e@sigill.intra.peff.net> <46a5b9b6-f3f6-7650-8a5b-b0b52223e375@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:21:46 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Arif Khokar's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:52:32 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Arif Khokar writes: > ... I > still think it would be better to be able to list the message-id > values in the header or body of the cover letter message of a patch > series (preferably the former) in order to facilitate downloading the > patches via NNTP from gmane or public-inbox.org. You are looking at builtin/log.c::make_cover_letter()? Patches welcome, but I think you'd need a bit of preparatory refactoring to allow gen_message_id() be called for all messages _before_ this function is called, as currently we generate them as we emit each patch. > Alternatively, or perhaps in addition to the list of message-ids, a > list of URLs to public-inbox.org or gmane messages could also be > provided for those who prefer to download patches via HTTP. Many people around here do not want to repeat the mistake of relying too much on one provider. Listing Message-IDs may be a good idea, listing URLs that are tied to one provider is less so.