From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA781F4C0 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731941AbfJYDLL (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:11:11 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:53911 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729283AbfJYDLL (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:11:11 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B68522F62; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:11:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=BWFB6SN6dp0v7r495OCYVctlNAs=; b=FETwLz yB/SGmus3kp2jo9yjBCyf+m1zEdXXeivVs3Sd1VWSGMLYg5NXmPUKCLfnzRqBUgb GF1gIn82JD8iRPMCU0/ibMwdfpOMgWTNOLHzjNpVBcCVMp7Dh5w3ARw0w5giKqR3 aCbvPfVdIcPYeR1TZ29r3VnTxm4ljcxds2aXs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VF8wbighjnXeMYEOIpFEOakITeZVlbDB FJ0/y11c0rD9FaDTO5Yw9BYFih+RjgWRH0hi6KRMRyyVD5wdvTf/ouOqzXir++pP qTj9ARTilarE2LZXPbgUQA9UOt/QhfdjJ85Zgoz2QfeXsXKiGEfLfXYJyyd+X8KN zULYwQ1UksE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4415122F61; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:11:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2B0D22F60; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:11:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/23] parsing and fsck cleanups References: <20191018044103.GA17625@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:11:07 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20191018044103.GA17625@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:41:03 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 17411878-F6D5-11E9-8D29-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > This a string of refactors that ends up with all of the > type-specific fsck functions not getting an object struct at all. > My goal there was two-fold: > > - it makes it harder to introduce weirdness like we saw in > patches 5-8. Yup. I'd see that alone as a reason that makes these worth doing. And it was a pleasant read. Thanks.