git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Michael J Gruber <git@grubix.eu>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
	Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] name-rev: provide debug output
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:06:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqd1cxz5gb.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14D0E7F4-0DC7-42ED-8DEE-B0338ECBA80D@grubix.eu> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:02:57 +0200")

Michael J Gruber <git@grubix.eu> writes:

>>The only case that this change may make a difference I can think of
>>is when you have a tag object pointed at from outside refs/tags
>>(e.g. refs/heads/foo is a tag object); if you are trying to change
>>the definition of "from_tag" from the current "Is the tip inside
>>refs/tags/?" to "Is the tip either inside refs/tags/ or is it a tag
>>object anywhere?", that may be a good change (I didn't think things
>>through, though), but that shouldn't be hidden inside a commit that
>>claims to only add support for debugging.
>>
>>What problem are you solving?  
>
> Sorry, I forgot about that change and failed to mention it.
>
> It makes no difference in the non-debug case which cares about the
> Boolean only. In the debug case, I want to distinguish between
> annotated and lightweight tags, just like describe --debug does. By
> adding 1 via deref and passing this down, I know that an annotated tag
> gets the value 2, a lightweight tag 1 and everything else 0, just like
> describe --tags.

So it sounds like you meant to do something else, and the
implementation is wrong for that something else (i.e. it wouldn't do
the right thing for a tag object outside refs/tags/, with or without
the "--debug" option passed).

>>> @@ -236,7 +273,6 @@ static int name_ref(const char *path, const
>>struct object_id *oid, int flags, vo
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>  	add_to_tip_table(oid->hash, path, can_abbreviate_output);
>>> -
>>>  	while (o && o->type == OBJ_TAG) {
>>>  		struct tag *t = (struct tag *) o;
>>>  		if (!t->tagged)
>>
>>This is a patch noise we can do without.
>>
>>Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-31 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15 13:15 [PATCH 0/3] describe --contains sanity Michael J Gruber
2017-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] describe: debug is incompatible with contains Michael J Gruber
2017-03-15 19:21   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-17 10:54     ` Michael J Gruber
2017-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] git-prompt: add a describe style for any tags Michael J Gruber
2017-03-15 19:25   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-17 10:56     ` Michael J Gruber
2017-03-15 13:15 ` [RFD PATCH 3/3] name-rev: Allow lightweight tags and branch refs Michael J Gruber
2017-03-15 16:14   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-15 19:50   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-15 20:51     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-15 22:50       ` [PATCH 0/2] Teach name-rev to pay more attention to lightweight tags Junio C Hamano
2017-03-15 22:50         ` [PATCH 1/2] name-rev: refactor logic to see if a new candidate is a better name Junio C Hamano
2017-03-15 22:50         ` [PATCH 2/2] name-rev: favor describing with tags and use committer date to tiebreak Junio C Hamano
2017-03-17  4:07           ` Lars Schneider
2017-03-17  5:45             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-17  5:56               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-17 17:09                 ` Lars Schneider
2017-03-17 17:17                   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-17 22:43                     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-29 14:39                       ` [PATCH v2 0/3] name-rev sanity Michael J Gruber
2017-03-29 14:39                         ` [PATCH v2 1/3] name-rev: refactor logic to see if a new candidate is a better name Michael J Gruber
2017-03-29 14:39                         ` [PATCH v2 2/3] name-rev: favor describing with tags and use committer date to tiebreak Michael J Gruber
2017-03-29 14:39                         ` [PATCH v2 3/3] name-rev: provide debug output Michael J Gruber
2017-03-29 17:15                         ` [PATCH v2 0/3] name-rev sanity Junio C Hamano
2017-03-29 17:43                           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-30 13:48                             ` Michael J Gruber
2017-03-30 17:30                               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-31 13:51                                 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Michael J Gruber
2017-03-31 13:51                                   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] name-rev: refactor logic to see if a new candidate is a better name Michael J Gruber
2017-03-31 13:51                                   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] name-rev: favor describing with tags and use committer date to tiebreak Michael J Gruber
2017-03-31 13:51                                   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] name-rev: provide debug output Michael J Gruber
2017-03-31 16:52                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-31 16:55                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-31 18:02                                       ` Michael J Gruber
2017-03-31 18:06                                         ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-03-31 18:33                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-03 14:46                                             ` Michael J Gruber
2017-04-03 17:07                                               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-20  5:19                                               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-31 19:10                                         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-31 13:51                                   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] describe: pass --debug down to name-rev Michael J Gruber
2017-03-17 11:25           ` [PATCH 2/2] name-rev: favor describing with tags and use committer date to tiebreak Michael J Gruber
2017-03-17 16:03             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-16  0:14         ` [PATCH 0/2] Teach name-rev to pay more attention to lightweight tags Stefan Beller
2017-03-16 10:28         ` Jacob Keller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqd1cxz5gb.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@grubix.eu \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
    --cc=luke@diamand.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).