From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC3D1F55B for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730295AbgFDRzt (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:55:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:60876 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730008AbgFDRzt (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:55:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6361C0642; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:55:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0PQlQwAj8laWZKYKNDTJlsmzzsM=; b=pcyYK7 CNtHjN6o1AeqameuP95FHYHXaC4WcFRXYwiyLpJnUyqQPUphJ/fFgmJ7WUXJ5q2d V1sxhBppP1pnpXpUfjPLe/F11xBrh3bbX/IEuFY5MnFOncNlanGvMz63syRBuuXC tjCOB+DbBWN7EqHHrqLB3LVXb9/8BX9dhcPHU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kT00YVBquIFMGRixcoe9ekc9xhCGKzV0 K7xdlcOGxR+a9GF7TBFN2TKuHePMCd6VZRcwJ9qSpjqtKKtWD/fe0rpjz4XJij8p 7aYUj5Rh6bBGwFyLvWSZC+dNUWMwdddoSyDeT7y9O2g+kH0Hr+EUKfrv+VYlDkKT Er1hLuHocc4= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDFAC0641; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:55:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2049BC063E; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:55:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Abhishek Kumar , git@vger.kernel.org, jnareb@gmail.com Subject: Re: [GSoC Patch 0/3] Move generation, graph_pos to a slab References: <20200604072759.19142-1-abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:55:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee's message of "Thu, 4 Jun 2020 10:22:27 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9DCFA4EC-A68C-11EA-83F0-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > If we have a commit-graph file, then we have graph_pos > and generation both coming from that file. Perhaps it > would be better to combine the data into a single slab > that stores a "struct commit_graph_data" or something? Excellent.