From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE0A203C1 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933642AbcKOBCb (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:02:31 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54277 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755161AbcKOBCa (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:02:30 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E877550878; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:02:28 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=x724UOcfpYptSatGb/HRzcCtyUA=; b=EpFL4i oWZsCAq6mTSNYgxW0mr6Z5fhdG84AkXhRP7yT7CFRKNfeYBKtgZ0SByOytwiFCAp h5oDN7rZIgNWVWTQ0m4sxuWgYU0zfAbCdtvyQqM4dx8OTIOOQcb5hjxfMqKlTIAi pc/SsZcd/HTgsTxvJ54pmEGkD/JG4rZyZhVrM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=X1SxK9gOwvv6v9eXGrbaCJ2B8VoIgKpK fKkvrbS5Gj19N70vVBRNXulu3X7fhzDU0WNsH1/zjIT0+R9nFGXb+5+AwTUdEegh iW8MrQbsagTmrPFuiEOC6NrXWMFnNHO1AOMpHeRXZTOpSOQxoDiAPefNmdsnC9lo Y5pqbhanvcA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9B450877; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:02:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 563A650876; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:02:28 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: David Turner , git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote-curl: don't hang when a server dies before any output References: <1478729910-26232-1-git-send-email-dturner@twosigma.com> <20161114182431.e7jjnq422c4xobdb@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161114194049.mktpsvgdhex2f4zv@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161115004426.unheihlmftlw6ex7@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:02:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20161115004426.unheihlmftlw6ex7@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:44:26 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2DC68254-AACF-11E6-ABA1-987C12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Actually, I take it back. I think it works for a single round of ref > negotiation, but not for multiple. Enabling GIT_TEST_LONG=1 causes it to > fail t5551. > > I think I've probably made a mis-assumption on exactly when in the HTTP > protocol we will see a flush packet (and perhaps that is a sign that > this protocol-snooping approach is not a good one). Hmph. I think I tried David's original under GIT_TEST_LONG and saw it got stuck; could be the same issue, I guess.