From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_CSS,URIBL_CSS_A shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A45B1F66E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 21:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="JF3mAVjS"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1359759AbiFGUtI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:49:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34198 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1356449AbiFGUsF (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:48:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCBB532C8 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5159B1250F5; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:39:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=F61Fd3fpSC33DJNwWU7pHGjTcw2F8mx/OkTK6Y LROZs=; b=JF3mAVjSaqOCn0uhjdsbKQcQiUO3YQBeWZQnXBJGGnvg7/ZZ1TztYQ EKuMBFhVCN7yv0uByrp67fLHrwc4FpRzjlqHD6vAaphedxR8O4yaJv4KZKKFBhA4 keAUmyh86iDO6uKu7f58fZSwxBvnlBukBSPKuBPnM9/lo48THfgiA= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482C01250F4; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:39:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.92.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4A721250EF; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:39:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau , Vicent Marti , Kaartic Sivaraam , Derrick Stolee , Abhradeep Chakraborty Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] bitmap-format.txt: feed the file to asciidoc to generate html References: Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 11:39:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 07 Jun 2022 17:43:32 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1E700330-E691-11EC-AA27-CB998F0A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget" writes: > From: Abhradeep Chakraborty > > Documentation/Makefile does not include bitmap-format.txt to generate > a html page using asciidoc. > > Teach Documentation/Makefile to also generate a html page for > Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt file. > > Signed-off-by: Abhradeep Chakraborty > --- > Documentation/Makefile | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) The change itself is obviously correct (assuming that it is worth passing the document to AsciiDoc, instead of reading it in text, that is). > diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile b/Documentation/Makefile > index d3f043f50d2..8d405a14330 100644 > --- a/Documentation/Makefile > +++ b/Documentation/Makefile > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ TECH_DOCS += MyFirstContribution > TECH_DOCS += MyFirstObjectWalk > TECH_DOCS += SubmittingPatches > TECH_DOCS += ToolsForGit > +TECH_DOCS += technical/bitmap-format > TECH_DOCS += technical/bundle-format > TECH_DOCS += technical/hash-function-transition > TECH_DOCS += technical/http-protocol Is bitmap-format the only one that is not fed to AsciiDoc, by the way? Are there other 'text-only' document that is worth converting to AsciiDoc? It is outside the scope of this series, of course, to actually adjusting them, but since you are already doing the homework, I thought you might already know the answer, which may become a source of inspriation for others to find something to work on. Thanks.